当海报修改自己的帖子时,需要有可见的记录 [英] When a poster amends his own post there needs to be a visible record of it

查看:48
本文介绍了当海报修改自己的帖子时,需要有可见的记录的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

如果我修改其他人的帖子,则需要说明原因.因此,长度必须至少为4个字符,否则不接受该修订.给出原因并提交更改后,帖子下方将显示一个文本,说明谁修改了 帖子以及出于什么原因(超过3个字符的原因"文字)

但是,如果我修改自己的帖子,则无需给出原因.如果我不给出原因,则帖子后没有记录表明我已经修改了自己的文字.

我以前认为这很有用,因为我可以迅速做出答复,并且知道不久之后我可以-看不见-对其进行纠正,但是现在我已经看到了这样做的负面影响.

张贴者重新张贴了一个长文本,其中包含相同的问题. (和文字)已经在他的另一个帖子中得到了答复.在该新文本的结尾处,出现了一个新问题.

因此,我在帖子顶部添加了主持人说明",以对读者说,本文是先前帖子的重复,并且其中的问题已经解决,因此他们应该跳到帖子末尾哪里有新问题.这个 主持人注释采用斜体字形式,以将其与发布者的文字分开.我还添加了更改的原因(添加了主持人的注释")

下一次我查看此帖子时,该帖子删除了我的整个主持人注释,但没有该帖子被编辑的记录.因此,帖子编辑者...添加了主持人注释"下方的行似乎胡说八道.当然可以 编辑帖子并删除主持人注释,并给出原因文本改进".但至少有记录显示OP已进行了这样的更改.

请重新提出为所有人(最好是除主持人(!)以外的所有人,但所有人都可以解决上述问题的人)进行修改的原因,以便可以清楚地看到何时进行了更改,以及由谁来

请注意,我所知道的唯一其他地方是无法跟踪谁在何时完成了什么操作,但是在另一个线程中却遇到了这个问题.

SP 2010常见问题" (主要有用的链接): http://wssv4faq.mindsharp.com/default.aspx
WSS3/MOSS常见问题解答(常见问题解答和链接) http://wssv3faq.mindsharp.com/default.aspx
两者都有指向大量书籍清单和(免费)在线章节的链接.

解决方案

感谢您的详细答复.

在这种情况下,我既需要编辑帖子(添加主持人说明,这样人们就不会阅读已经回答的问题),然后迅速对其进行回复.

我一直在尝试通过现有帖子中的主持人注释来避免将帖子扩展为仅仅是内务处理而与技术问题无关的话题,但是很明显,如果我的主持人注释被删除,我需要更改策略. /p>

再次感谢您的解释.我还没有做得那么详细.

迈克

稍后:此主题中有大量答复,所有答复都已被明确删除.这解释了为什么该帖子以感谢详细答复"开头.为何删除帖子以及仅由主持人在此处看到谁(谁).


If I amend the post of someone else, I need to give a reason. This reason needs to be at least 4 characters long or the amendment isn't accepted. Once the reason has been given and the change submitted, there is a text below the post saying who amended the post and for what reason (the more than 3 chars "reason" text)

If however I amend my own post, I don't need to give a reason. If I don't give a reason there is no record after the post that I have amended my own text.

I used to think this was useful as I could snap off a quick reply and know I could - unseen - correct it shortly afterwards, but now I've seen the negative consequences of this.

A poster re-posted a long text containing the identical question  (and text) that had already been answered in another thread from him. Right at the end of that new text there was a new question.

So I added a Moderator Note at the top of the post saying to readers that this text was a repeat of an earlier post and that the question in it had already been solved, so they should jump right to the end of the post where there was a new question. This Moderator Note was in Italic to separate it off from the poster's text. I also added a reason for the change ("Moderator's Note added")

Next time I looked at this thread, the post had my entire Moderator Note removed and yet there was no record of the post having been edited. Because of this the line below the post "Edited by ... Moderator Note added" seemed nonsense. Of course the OP can edit a post and remove a Moderator Note and give a reason "text improved" but at least then there is a record that the OP *has* made such a change.

Please re-introduce the need to give a reason for an Edit for all (preferably for all except Moderators (!) but for all solves the above problem) so that there is a visible record of when a change has been made and by whom.

Note that the only other place I know of where it is impossible to track who has done what and when is unlocking - but I have that problem in another thread.


SP 2010 "FAQ" (mainly useful links): http://wssv4faq.mindsharp.com/default.aspx
WSS3/MOSS FAQ (FAQ and Links) http://wssv3faq.mindsharp.com/default.aspx
Both also have links to extensive book lists and to (free) on-line chapters

解决方案

Thanks for the detailed reply.

In this case I'd need to both edit the post (add the Moderator Note so people don't read the already answered question) and then quickly reply to it.

I've been trying through Moderator Notes in existing posts to avoid extending threads with posts that are merely housekeeping and nothing to do with the technical question, but clearly if my Moderator Notes are being deleted I need to change the tactic.

Thanks again for the explanation. I hadn't worked it out in such detail.

Mike

Later: There were a mass of replies in this thread all of which have clearly been deleted. That explains why this post starts with "Thanks for the detailed reply." Why the posts were deleted and by whom is (by whom) only visible to moderators here.


这篇关于当海报修改自己的帖子时,需要有可见的记录的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆