在xUnit.net忽略异常 [英] Ignoring Exceptions in xUnit.net

查看:254
本文介绍了在xUnit.net忽略异常的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一些情况下,我不在乎什么异常被抛出(只要有些异常被抛出)。不幸的是,

  Assert.Throws<异常>(someDelegate);
 

不及格,除非异常的确切(所以不是派生类的实例)被抛出的一个实例。我知道我可以得到我想要的行为

 异常异常= Record.Exception(someDelegate);
Assert.NotNull(例外);
 

,但它不能读取正确的。我缺少的东西在的xUnit有我想要的行为?这里有两个测试,表明我的意思:

  [事实]
公共无效Throws_exception_and_passes(){
    异常异常= Record.Exception(
        ()=> {抛出新的InvalidOperationException异常(); }
    );
    Assert.NotNull(例外);
}

[事实]
公共无效Throws_exception_and_fails(){
    Assert.Throws<异常>(
        ()=> {抛出新的InvalidOperationException异常(); }
    );
}
 

解决方案

每这里的文档:

HTTP://xunit.$c$cplex.com/ Wiki页面标题= HowToUse和放大器; referringTitle =首页

您必须指定抛出你想要的异常类型。在一般情况下,这是很好的做法。你应该能够predict什么情景测试会抛出异常的类型。你应该能够设计出你们两个的方法和方式的测试,让你predict这一点。

有办法解决这个,像做了尝试发现自己,但你应该考虑改变你的设计了一下。

I have some cases where I don't care what exception is thrown (as long as some exception is thrown). Unfortunately,

Assert.Throws<Exception>(someDelegate);

doesn't pass unless exactly an instance of Exception (so not an instance of a derived class) is thrown. I know I can obtain the behavior I want with

Exception exception = Record.Exception(someDelegate);
Assert.NotNull(exception);

but it doesn't read right. Am I missing something in xUnit that has the behavior I want? Here are two tests that indicate what I mean:

[Fact]
public void Throws_exception_and_passes() {
    Exception exception = Record.Exception(
        () => { throw new InvalidOperationException(); }
    );
    Assert.NotNull(exception);
}

[Fact]
public void Throws_exception_and_fails() {
    Assert.Throws<Exception>(
        () => { throw new InvalidOperationException(); }
    );
}

解决方案

Per the documentation here:

http://xunit.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=HowToUse&referringTitle=Home

You have to specify the type of exception you want to be thrown. In general, this is good practice. You should be able to predict what scenarios a test would throw what type of exception. You should be able to design both you method and your test in a way that will allow you to predict this.

There are ways around this, like doing a try catch yourself, but you should look into changing your design a bit.

这篇关于在xUnit.net忽略异常的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆