微软技术与开源技术 [英] Microsoft Technologies vs Opensource Technologies

问题描述

为什么我们使用Microsoft Technologies而不是Opensource Technologies?哪个是最好的?两者之间有什么区别?任何一个Plz都回复我紧急....

Why we use Microsoft Technologies instead of Opensource Technologies?Which one is Best?What is the difference between these?Any one Plz Reply me urgent....

推荐答案

谁是"我们"，我可以问你吗?怎么会有人知道您使用此或那个的原因?例如，就像其他许多人一样，我同时使用这两种方法.有些人相信或不相信，只会使用开源.这使您的问题以及有什么区别"都不正确.

你怎么能回答苹果和苹果有什么区别"?

尽可能多地了解这两个知识.如果您对编程和/或数学有所了解，则应该了解比较需要定义.如果您可以定义比较(订单)运算符，则有一些要讨论的内容.

—SA

Who are "we", may I ask you? How anyone may know the reason you use this or that? For instance, I use both, like many other people do. Some people use only Open Source, believe or not. That makes your question incorrect, as well as "what the difference".

How could you answer "what''s the difference between apple and Apple"?

Learn about both as much as you need, that''s it. If you know a bit about programming and/or mathematics you should understand that comparison needs definition. If you could define your comparison (order) operator, there would be something to discuss.

—SA

有很多因素定义了这一点，因此任何人都不可能给出确切的答案.

这取决于您负担得起的费用(不仅在技术方面)，而且还取决于技能水平(您和您的员工).您可以雇用多少人力以及什么样的人力.这也取决于客户端可以(并希望运行)什么.

也涉及工作量变量-使用特定技术需要花费多少时间来实现.
然后，当然是支持问题-维护您开发的内容有多容易.您需要支付维护费用吗?

正如我所说，这场辩论涉及的因素太多.

There are so many factors that define this, that it is impossible for any one to give an exact answer.

It depends on what you can afford (not only in terms of technology) but also in terms of skill sets (you and your people). How much manpower you can hire and of what kind. It also depends on what the client can (and wants to run).

There are effort variable involved too - how much time using a particular technology will take to implement.
Then ofcourse, the support issue - how easy is it to maintain what you developed. Do you need to pay for maintenance.

As I said, this debate has just too many factors involved.

我同意SA&阿比那夫.

只是这取决于.口述一些因素，例如成本，与其他事物的交互，支持等.双方都可以看到优势&缺点.

其他重要因素是客户.如果您的客户要求解决方案，那么您必须根据他们的要求为他们提供解决方案，无论是商业还是开源的.您无法说服所有客户进行转换(开放源< =>商业).

有时您可能有机会在两者中都工作.我曾在.NET中的项目前端工作过，但后端是mySql，因为客户端需要购买SQL Server的许可证，因此他们选择了mySql.

我喜欢Microsoft的 UI ，它很简单&工作愉快.然后互操作性&这么多因素.

如果您用Google搜索关键字，则可以找到更多内容.

I agree with SA & Abhinav.

Simply It depends. Orally some factors like Cost, Interaction with other things, support, etc., Both side you can see advantages & disadvantages.

Other important factor is Client. If your client is asking a solution then you must give them on their requirement whether Commercial or open source. You can''t convince all of your clients to switch over(Open source <=> Commercial).

Some times you may have a chance to work in both. I have worked in a project front end in .NET but the back-end is mySql because the client need to buy license for SQL server, so they opted mySql.

I like Microsoft for the UI which is simple & nice to work. And then Interoperability & so many factors.

If you Google for your keywords then you can find more things.

这篇关于微软技术与开源技术的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！