componentArt ... componentOne和syncfusion [英] componentArt... componentOne and syncfusion

查看:74
本文介绍了componentArt ... componentOne和syncfusion的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

C#dotnet第三方....... componentArt ... componentOne和以性能更好的syncfusion
哪一个提供更多的动画...
并且具有更多的控制权和更多的帮助,并且易于使用...
在各个方面都需要比较....

C# dotnet third party .......componentArt... componentOne and syncfusion which is better by performance
which one provide more animation...
and which have more control and more help and which is easy to use...
in all aspect need comparesion....

推荐答案

C#dotnet第三方....... componentArt ... componentOne和syncfusion比较好按性能
好吧,您很幸运能得到这样的答复,因为很少有人会在这三个方面都做过(需要比较).

我从事过ComponentArt.我发现它不错,并且性能可以接受.


具有更多控制权
这完全取决于您要在应用程序中使用哪些控件.通常,所有控件中几乎都具有相似的控件,只有少数例外.您需要决定是否需要任何特定的控制.


我建议您下载所有这三个版本的演示版本,并从控件的角度和性能上自己进行分析.可能您可以做一个小的POC来检查三个的性能(将它们一次一个地用于相同的操作.)
C# dotnet third party .......componentArt... componentOne and syncfusion which is better by performance
Well, you would be lucky to get specific reply to such thing as rarely someone would had worked on all the three (which would be needed to compare)

I have worked on ComponentArt. I found it good and have acceptable performance.


which have more control
It all depends what controls you want to use in your application. Generally almost similar controls in all of them with few exceptions. It''s you who need to decide if any specific control is needed.


I would suggest you to download the demo versions of all the three and analyze them yourself - both from controls point of view and performance. Might be you can do a small POC to check the performance of three (Use them for same operation one by one.)


这篇关于componentArt ... componentOne和syncfusion的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆