简单的C/C ++/没有启动进程的MFC GUI [英] Simple C/C++/no MFC GUI that launches a process

问题描述

你好，

我需要一个简单的C/C ++ GUI到一些控制台程序的示例，而没有MFC/ATL:omg:
可能只是一个带有2个或3个选项卡的选项对话框和一个大的运行按钮.

您知道这样的应用程序吗?

我发现的所有应用程序要么依赖MFC，要么or肿，或者使用C#..:sigh:

请帮忙.

谢谢.

Hello,

I need an example of simple C/C++ GUI to some console program, with no MFC/ATL :omg:
Maybe just a dialog with 2 or 3 tabs for options and big fat run button.

Do you know of such an application?

All the applications I found were either relying on MFC, or bloated, or in C#, .. :sigh:

Please help.

With my thanks.

推荐答案

如果没有MFC，ATL或C#，则必须在Win32中编写它.在此处开始 [ ^ ].

如果您进行搜索，CP上也有很多文章.

If no MFC, ATL or C#, then you''ll have to write it in Win32. Start here[^].

There are PLENTY of articles at CP as well, if you search.

在纯Win32中创建真实的" GUI应用程序确实不值得.

It''s really not worth the time to create a "real" GUI application in plain Win32.

实际上，我发现Qt与Win32或MFC相比要好得多.如果您不是在开发Windows特定的应用程序(例如Windows服务，外壳增强实用程序等)，那么Qt会比我所见过的其他任何东西都要好得多.

我不确定开发工具的大小如何影响API或其提供的功能的设计.您不应基于这样的肤浅标准选择开发工具.该工具的选择应使您可以使用它来完成给定的任务.

您是否会因为锹/铲子太大而笨拙地用勺子挖一个洞? Win32是汤匙，而Qt是铲子-您决定.

-Saurabh

Actually I find Qt much better compared to Win32 or MFC. If you are not developing a windows specific application like windows service, shell enhancement utilities etc then Qt is much much better then anything else I have seen.

I am not sure how does the size of development tools effect the design of API or of the functionality it provides. You should not choose development tools based on such superficial criterion. The tool should be chosen such that using it you can accomplish the given task.

Would you use a spoon to dig a hole just because spade/shovel is too big and bulky? Win32 is spoon and Qt is shovel - you decide.

-Saurabh

这篇关于简单的C/C ++/没有启动进程的MFC GUI的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！