Active MQ与JBoss消息传递 [英] Active MQ vs JBoss Messaging

问题描述

我将为项目选择一个JMS消息代理. JMS服务器必须稳定并且可以处理大量消息，这一点至关重要.我缩小了范围，以包括Active MQ和JBoss Messaging.

I am going to choose a JMS message broker for a project. It is critical that the JMS server is stable and can handle a high load of messages. I have narrowed down the list to include Active MQ and JBoss Messaging.

我想知道你们中的任何一个是否有任何经验，或者甚至更好地在同一个环境中尝试过这两个方法.与研究论文或类似文章的任何链接都很好.

I was wondering if any of you have any experience with any of these or even better have tried both of them in the same environment. Any link to a research paper or similar would be nice.

推荐答案

由于JBoss/Red Hat有一个新的Java消息传递项目HornetQ，JBoss Messaging现在仅处于错误修复模式.

JBoss Messaging is now in bug fix mode only, since JBoss / Red Hat has a new Java messaging project called HornetQ.

该网站位于 http://hornetq.org

HornetQ具有出色的性能，完整的功能集和易用性.

HornetQ boasts extreme performance, a full feature set and ease of use.

与ActiveMQ相比，您会发现它的性能非常出色.

You'll find it's performance compared to ActiveMQ is extremely good.

顺便说一句-我是JBoss Messaging和HornetQ的项目负责人.

BTW - I am the project lead for JBoss Messaging and HornetQ.

HornetQ 2.0.0.GA在下周发布.

HornetQ 2.0.0.GA is out in the next week.

这篇关于Active MQ与JBoss消息传递的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！