是否PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY排除GPS供应商？ [英] Does PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY exclude the GPS provider?
问题描述
从<一个得到这个href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22408867/how-much-accuracy-does-priority-balanced-power-accuracy-give\">How太多的精确性不PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY给？
该HIGH_ACCURACY模式使用的所有位置的提供者，但是，它优先考虑的位置，并提供包含GPS定位与供应商一起。定位精度约为10米的范围内。
The HIGH_ACCURACY mode use all location providers, However, it prioritize the location providers and include GPS along with location providers. The location accuracy is approximately within 10 meters of range.
该BALANCED_POWER模式GPS排除其位置提供的列表，并使用包括手机发射塔，无线网络等。在这种情况下，根据对方提供者，定位精度约为40米。
The BALANCED_POWER mode exclude GPS for its list of location providers, and use the other providers based including cell towers, wifi etc. In this case, the location accuracy is approximately 40 meters.
该NO_POWER不使用任何位置提供，取而代之的则是从其他应用程序获取位置的被动模式。精度可以是一英里或更长。它完全是基于是最近由其他应用程序取的位置。
The NO_POWER do not use any location provider, instead it is a passive mode of getting location from other apps. The accuracy could be a mile or more. It is solely based on the locations that are fetch by other applications recently.
这是真的，完全PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY排除了GPS供应商？我一直认为它仍然使用了GPS供应商，但只有当网络提供商不可用的假设下。任何澄清是AP preciated。
Is it true that PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY excludes that GPS provider altogether? I've always been under the assumption that it still uses the GPS provider but only when the network provider was not available. Any clarification would be appreciated.
推荐答案
环视了一下后，它看起来像PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY确实如此完全排除GPS。
After looking around a bit, it looks like PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY does indeed exclude GPS altogether.
<一个href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20330606/google-play-services-for-android-location-client-not-update-location-if-wifi-di\">Google播放服务为Android。如果禁用无线位置客户端无法更新的位置
Google Play Services for Android. Location client not update location if wifi disabled
这篇关于是否PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY排除GPS供应商？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
