通过eclipselink中的键了解TABLE_PER_CLASS [英] Understanding of TABLE_PER_CLASS with keys in eclipselink
问题描述
我有一个带有Eclipselink和TABLE_PER_CLASS继承策略的简单Java EE 7 Web应用程序.
I have a simple Java EE 7 Web App with Eclipselink and the TABLE_PER_CLASS inheritance strategy.
以下课程:
@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)
@Entity
public abstract class AbstractService implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 7041207658121699813L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn
private PersonGroup personGroup;
}
@Entity
public class Service extends AbstractService implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3817106074951672799L;
}
@Entity
public class PersonGroup implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3205092801888510996L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "personGroup")
private List<AbstractService> services;
}
在persistence.xml中,我进行拖放创建.
In persistence.xml I do Drop&Create.
创建数据库后,我有以下表格:
After creating the database, I have this tables:
抽象服务,服务,人员组
abstractservice, service, persongroup
现在要说的是,eclipselink使用(仅(!))属性persongroup_id(没有"id"属性)创建了表abstractservice.为什么?
The point is now, that eclipselink creates the table abstractservice with (only(!)) the attribute persongroup_id (no "id" attribute). Why?
我对TABLE_PER_CLASS的理解是,每个属性和键都在下降",因此abstractservice应该没有更多属性,并且不应该存在.
My understanding from TABLE_PER_CLASS is, that every attribute and key is going "down", so abstractservice should have no more attributes and should not exist.
我的业务情况是,我有很多AbstractService的子服务.我想通过特殊的人员组从AbstractService获取所有子服务.
My businesscase is, that I have a lot of subservice from AbstractService. I want to get all subservices from AbstractService with a special persongroup.
AbstractServicetable没有条目,因为所有内容都在服务中.
The AbstractServicetable has no entries, because everything is in Service.
对于CriteriaBuilder,我说:
With CriteriaBuilder I say:
Select from AbstractService where persongroup_id = 123;
标准Api"应该构建此文件(如果存在更多子服务,则需要进行一些联合),因为我有TABLE_PER_CLASS:
The Criteria Api should build this (with some union, if more subservices would exist), because I have TABLE_PER_CLASS:
Select from Service where persongroup_id = 123;
为什么eclipselink在abstractService中创建persongroup_id,如何解决我的情况? 最后,查询结果始终为空,因为abstractService为空...
Why is eclipselink creating persongroup_id in abstractService and how can I solve my case? At the end the result of the query is always empty, because abstractService is empty...
推荐答案
在此处提出了相同的问题: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/406338/ 似乎与错误 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/有关show_bug.cgi?id = 265702 ,该问题已修复但已回归.如果您在最新版本中看到此错误,则应为其提交新的错误.
Same question was asked here: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/406338/ and seems to be related to bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265702 which was fixed but regressed. A new bug should be filed for it if you are seeing this in the latest version.
如果仅使用单个Servide子类,则可能需要使其成为一个mappingSuperclass.如果不是,通常建议使用其他继承类型,例如联接表或单个表.该错误似乎仅影响DDL的生成,因此您可以切换为让JPA创建脚本,然后可以对其进行编辑以删除AbstractService表条目.
If you are only using a single Servide subclass, you might want to make it a mappedSuperclass instead. If not, a different inheritance type such as joined or single table is usually recommended. This bug seems to only affect DDL generation, so you can switch to have JPA create a script that you can then edit to remove the AbstractService table entries.
这篇关于通过eclipselink中的键了解TABLE_PER_CLASS的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!