Dropbox VS SVN，LAN同步 [英] Dropbox VS SVN, LAN syncing

问题描述

在我们的新办公室中，文件共享存在一些问题.当前，我们正在使用DropBox，但由于所有其他功能，我们更愿意使用SVN.

据我了解，DropBox的好处是它还可以通过LAN与其他计算机同步，因此不会大量使用Internet.这对于大型艺术品非常有用.我不知道有执行此操作的SVN客户端.

我们这里有一个机架式服务器，因此可以使用它，但是它太吵了，无法整天运行.

有什么想法吗?

谢谢！

解决方案

Dropbox和SVN确实会为您存储文件，而存储方式和两个系统的用例都大不相同. >

Subversion首先是版本/修订版控制工具.您执行签出"以接收存储在中央存储库中的所有这些文件，如果更改文件，则需要将这些更改提交"回存储库以供其他人检索，而其他人则必须从存储库中进行更新"以便在本地查看您的更改，并可能合并"您对其本地更改所做的任何更改.首先，这可能是一个非常棘手的操作，并且实际上仅适用于纯文本文件. Subversion可以完全在您的LAN上运行.

Dropbox更像是文件备份和共享解决方案，文件更改历史记录有限(目前为1个月). Dropbox不会合并冲突文件(即，两个或多个用户已同时更新的文件)，而是将冲突文件的副本保存在文件名后，并将它们来自的计算机的名称保存在文件名之后.

不能完全根据所提供的有限信息为上述之一或其他解决方案提出建议.您应该考虑用例，即您要共享什么类型的文件? Subversion可以存储任何类型的文件，但是在出现冲突的地方，纯文本总是更易于合并.

At our new office we have a bit of a problem with file sharing. Currently we are using DropBox, but we'd prefer to use SVN because of all the extra features.

The nice thing about DropBox is, as far as I understood, that it also syncs over the LAN with other computeres, so not using the internet heavily. This is great for big art files. I don't know any SVN client that does this.

We have a rackable server here, so could use that, but it's just too noisy to run all day.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

解决方案

While it's true that both Dropbox and SVN will store files for you the manner in which you store them and the use cases of both systems are quite different.

Subversion is first and foremost a version/revision control tool. You do a 'checkout' to recieve all of those files stored in a central repository, if you change files you need to 'commit' those changes back to the repository for others to retrieve and others have to do an 'update' from the repository to see your changes locally and potentially 'merge' any changes you have made with their local changes. This can be quite a tricky operation to begin with and is really only suitable on plain text files. Subversion can be run entirely across your LAN.

Dropbox on the other hand is more like a file backup and sharing solution with a limited history of changes to files (1 month at the moment). Instead of merging confilcting files (i.e. files two or more users have been updating at the same time), Dropbox will save copies of the conflicting files with the name of the computer they came from appended to the file name.

Making a recommendation for one of the above or a different solution entirely cannot be based on the limited information provided. You should consider your use case, i.e. what types of files are you wanting to share? Subversion can store any type of file but where confilcts emerge, plain text is always the easier to merge.

这篇关于Dropbox VS SVN，LAN同步的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！