从其他网站获取代码和设计. Ripoff还是Standard? [英] Taking code and design from other Websites. Ripoff or Standard?

问题描述

在设计我的网站时，我一直面临着是否可以接受其他网站的想法和设计的问题.在某些情况下，在某些方面没有区别.这在道德上有什么不对吗?这在设计编程社区中是期望的吗?

While designing my site I am constantly faced with the issue of whether its ok to TAKE ideas and designs from other sites. In some cases there is no distinction in certain aspects. Is there anything ethically wrong with this? Is this expected in the design programming community?

推荐答案

取决于您偷"了多少东西.

代码

如果您要撕裂整个设计，那么它会有点躲闪.如果您喜欢(例如)对事物进行投票的Stack Overflow概念，则可以窃取该概念并以其他方式使用它.如果您想知道被投票项目的橙色突出显示如何工作，请查看代码.但是不要同时做这件事，也不要偷走概念和设计，只是创建一个克隆.

If you're ripping off the whole design, then its a bit dodgy. If you like (for example) the Stack Overflow concept of voting up stuff, then steal the concept and use it in a different manner. If you want to know how say the orange highlighting of the up-voted items works, then look at the code. But don't do both and steal both the concept and the design, you'll just create a clone.

由于不同的Web浏览器对待CSS等的方式，通常只有很少的几种方法可以完成特定的工作(3列布局等).在存在通常的做事方式的情况下，公然复制是很公平的.在其独特之处和多种实现方式中，公然复制似乎还有些困难.

Due to the way different web browsers treat CSS and the like, there are often only a very few limited ways to do a particular thing (3-column layouts, etc.). It seems fair enough to blatantly copy in these cases where there is a common way of doing things. Where its something unique, and there's many ways of doing it, it seems a bit more off to blatantly copy.

图形

剥去图形-不太好.图片的长度比代码长得多，因此版权法等可能更适合它们.如果没有其他问题，则您必须与可能的水印或其他元数据进行竞争，以标识原始来源.检查图像是否被窃取非常容易，对于大块内的代码则更是如此.

Ripping off graphics - not so okay. Images have been around a lot longer than code so copyright law, etc. probably suits them better. If nothing else you have to contend with possible watermarks or other metadata to identify the original source. It's very easy to check for image stealing, less so for code within a larger block.

我是编码员，而不是设计师，所以我倾向于做的是借用我喜欢的图像，同时将其网络应用程序模拟为内部使用.看起来公平吗?在上线之前，我将其更改为新设计的或付费的.至少就是这个主意，尽管很容易忘记和偶然使用它们.

I'm a coder, not a designer so what I tend to do is borrow graphics that I like just while mocking up my web-app for internal use. Does that seem fair? I'll change them for newly-designed or paid-for ones before going live. At least that's the idea, though it could be far too easy to forget and use them by accident.

这就是它在报纸界的运作方式(它曾经使用过，现在还不确定Internet的出现)，您可以下载尽可能多的图形，以免等待通过57.6k调制解调器的麻烦.您只需为实际发布的内容付费.

That's the way it works in the newspaper world (well it used to, not sure now with the advent of this there Internet thang): You download as many graphics as you can bother waiting to come over your 57.6k modem; you only pay for the ones you actually publish.

这篇关于从其他网站获取代码和设计. Ripoff还是Standard?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！