是否可以在商业网站上使用CKEditor? [英] Is it possible to use CKEditor in commercial web site?

问题描述

我计划在商业站点中使用CKEditor.我已经读过 http://ckeditor.com/license ，但我不明白在提供LGPL的同时为商业使用定价(这是商业用途的不错选择)

I plan to use CKEditor in commercial site. I've read http://ckeditor.com/license but I didn't understand how it is possible to have pricing for commercial use while they offer LGPL(which is good choice for commercial use)

推荐答案

假设您要将CkEditor的javascript代码编译为二进制应用程序.只是假设这是可能的.这样一来，您就不再需要发送库的源代码.

Imagine you want to compile the javascript code of CkEditor into a binary application. Just assume this is possible. Then you would not ship the source code of the library any longer.

如果您现在甚至修改了源代码以在二进制文件中分发，您就不会满足LGPL的要求，因为LGPL要求您将库的源代码与二进制文件一起提供.对于MPL也是一样.

If you now even make modifications to the source code to distribute within the binary, you do not satisfy the LGPL as it requires that you provide the source for the library along with your binary. Same for the MPL.

如果您不想分发(更改)库的源代码形式，则可以通过该项目获得商业许可证(购买许可证).

If you don't want to distribute (your changes in) the source-code form of the library, you then can get a commercial license by the project (you buyout the license).

在这种特殊情况下，我可以想象一些人，如果他们的法律部门非常困惑，他们只是想获得商业许可证作为备用.如果许可证相对便宜，他们可以选择许可证并继续自己的工作，而不会被进一步打断.业务，您需要保持运行.

Next to such specific cases I can imagine that some folks just would like to have a commercial license as form of a backup if their legal department is too much puzzled. If the license is relatively cheap, they can opt for it and continue with their own work w/o being further interrupted. Business, you need to keep it running.

但是关于LGPL，只要您提供该库的源代码(包括您可能所做的更改)，就可以将其与非自由程序一起使用.因此，这并不意味着您的网站必须是LGPL，而只是使用LGPL编辑的库.

But regarding the LGPL, as long as you offer source (incl. the changes you probably make) of the library, you're fine to use it with non-free programs. So this does not mean that your website must be LGPL it's just using a LGPL'ed library.

这篇关于是否可以在商业网站上使用CKEditor?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！