我在网站的哪里包含他人作品的版权声明? [英] where do I include the copyright notice of someone else's work in my website?
问题描述
我的网站包含: 1.FancyBox(用于图像叠加) 2.GalleryView(一个滑块) 都使用JQuery.
它们都可以免费使用，但是他们坚持在使用作品的地方显示版权信息. 我对必须在哪里显示消息感到困惑. GalleryView的许可消息. (我想都是Fancybox都在MIT许可下)
Copyright (c) 2009 John Anderson III
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.
我在哪里可以在我的网站上显示它? 并且我应该为我不直接使用的JQuery单独显示一条消息吗?
让我们以开发人员的身份来看看:
我的网站包含:1.FancyBox(用于图像叠加)2.GalleryView(滑块)，并且都使用JQuery.
可以这么说，如果用户访问您的网站，则您提供了一些要下载的软件.当用户决定下载软件(激活脚本)时，请提供以下软件的副本:
注意: 3.包含具有不同作者和许可的第三方代码，主要是.让我们从BSD-3-Clause许可文本中选择该部分:
重新分发源代码必须保留以上版权声明，此条件列表和以下免责声明.
并在MIT许可文本中:
上述版权声明和本许可声明应包含在本软件的所有副本或重要部分中.
我认为这两个都非常清楚:传递软件时，应传递作者信用/版权/使用条款/许可.
根据交付软件的方式，您可以将这些术语放在源代码中，然后直接与javascript文件一起交付.
如果您创建该软件的二进制版本(例如打包/压缩该软件)，则这些注释可能会被删除.您仍然可以再次将其添加到文件顶部.
在这里jQuery非常慷慨，例如对于由Google Inc.以外的任何人交付的文件，您会发现:
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js
/*! jQuery v1.7.2 jquery.com | jquery.org/license */ (function(a,b){function cy(a) ...
因此Google通过说该文件是什么软件(jQuery v1.7.2)，从(jquery.com)获得文件的位置来提供信用"，并提供许可信息(jquery.org/license).从法律上讲，如果您与律师交谈，这可能还不够，但是，在这种情况下，我认为这是jQuery项目可接受的过程.
但这并不意味着这对约翰·安德森三世，乔治·麦金利·史密斯和罗伯特·彭纳(也许是布莱尔·米切尔莫尔)就可以了.后来的顺便说一句.使用 WTFPL许可，这被认为是个玩笑.通常不会接受它，并且提出了不必要的问题，所以再次，打包3.的作者可能应该与云栈人员所做的相同.. >
一位网络情妇的结论
我们通常将链接在<head>中的<script>标记中的软件(通常是<body>较少)最好打包分发，以节省不必要的流量.这意味着文件的源格式已更改，并且经常缺少包含版权和许可信息的注释.但是通常这些许可证要求我们提供该信息.
使用另一种语义HTML功能来提供版权信息似乎很有希望:您可以将版权链接放在脚本标签旁边的头部:
<link href="contact.html#credits" rel="copyright" title="Licensing Information">
或针对HTML 5阵营中的我们这些人:
<link href="contact.html#credits" rel="license" title="Licensing Information">
此示例提供了另一个超文本标记语言文档，该文档列出了所使用的软件，并以人类可读的形式提供其许可信息( Where am I to show it in my website?
And should I show a separate message for JQuery which I don't directly use? Let us take a look as developers: My website contains: 1.FancyBox (for image overlay) 2.GalleryView (a slider) and both use JQuery. So to speak, if a user visits your website, you offer some software to download. When the user decides to download the software (activate scripts), you provide a copy of the following software:
Note: 3. contains third party code with different authors and licenses, mainly As one can see with this listing - and ignoring the problems in 3. for a moment - all software is available under free software license, so as you wrote, they are free to use. But as you have worded it, they "insist on their copyright message shown where the work is used.". Let's pick that part from the Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. And from the The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. I think this is both pretty clear: When you pass along the software, you should pass along author credits / copyright / the usage terms / license. Depending on how you deliver the software, you can put these terms inside the source-code and deliver it with the javascript files directly. If you create binary version of the software (e.g. pack/compress the software), those comments then might be removed. You are still able to add those again on top of the file. jQuery is pretty generous here btw, for example for the files that are delivered by nobody less than Google Inc., You find this: https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js
So Google gives "Credit" by saying what software that file is (jQuery v1.7.2), from where they obtained it from (jquery.com) and they provide the licensing information (jquery.org/license). Legally this might not be enough if you talk with your lawyer, however, in this case I assume this is an accepted procedure by the jQuery project. But this does not mean that this would be okay for John Anderson III, George McGinley Smith, and Robert Penner (and perhaps Blair Mitchelmore). The later btw. uses the WTFPL License which is considered a joke. It normally is not accepted and raises needless questions, so again, the author who packages up 3. should probably do same as the cloudstack folks did. That software we normally link in It looks promising to just make use of another semantic HTML feature to provide copyright information: The copyright link you can place into the head next to script tags: or for the ones of us in the HTML 5 camp: This is an example providing another hyptertext markup language document that lists the used software and gives its licensing information in human readable form (compare). Please consult the HTML reference of your choice to learn more about the Hope this is helpful. I don't want to prevent you to go to a lawyer to further clarify this, however, your lawyer might not even add more to this: Credits page, provide license information and a link to that page from every page that links as well the software. What can one want more? And I bet, if you do this, you are one of the more good citizens out there. IANAL just a software developer, so thank you for asking for feedback, I could have been one of those other developers and naturally I prefer it if somebody asks instead of not doing anything. I would say as a developer: The most important thing is that users of my software learn about the rights they have with the software they use. Thank you for asking how to make that possible! 这篇关于我在网站的哪里包含他人作品的版权声明?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
MIT or GPL.MIT or GPL.MIT
BSD-3-Clause as far as I could see, but I did not looked further. I'd say, if you have professional interest in using that library contact the author of that library, ask to correct the licensing information. Permissive licenses like BSD-3-Clause have requirements that need to be matched to gain usage rights. Just saying, I'd say it's common, so nothing to worry, just to take care of.
BSD-3-Clause license text:
MIT license text:
/*! jQuery v1.7.2 jquery.com | jquery.org/license */
(function(a,b){function cy(a) ...
A Webmistress' Conclusion
<script> tags in <head> (and less often <body>) is best distributed packed to spare us needless traffic. That means the source-form of the file is altered and often the comments containing the copyright and licensing information is missing. But often these licenses require us to provide that information.<link href="contact.html#credits" rel="copyright" title="Licensing Information">
<link href="contact.html#credits" rel="license" title="Licensing Information">
<link> tag.
