为什么客户端负载均衡器会像Ribbon一样? [英] Why client-side load balancers like Ribbon?

问题描述

Netflix使用功能区(Ribbon)，Ribbon在其术语中是客户端负载平衡器".与传统的负载均衡器相比，客户端负载均衡器的用例和优势是什么? Ribbon和其他Netflix OSS服务是特定于AWS的，还是可以在其他上下文中使用?

Netflix makes use of Ribbon, which is in their terms a "client-side load-balancer". What are the use-cases and advantages of a client-side load-balancer compared to a traditional load-balancer? Is Ribbon, and other Netflix OSS services AWS -specific or can they be used in other contexts?

推荐答案

使用功能区已经提到，您不需要额外的负载平衡器.如果需要，您还可以为每个客户端配置不同的平衡算法.起初我也有些惊讶，但这确实很有意义.

As already mentioned by using Ribbon you don't need an additional load balancer. You can also configure the balancing algorithm for each client differently, if you need to. At first I was a bit surprised also, but it does make a lot of sense.

当前，大部分使用Netflix OSS的Spring Cloud独立于AWS.

Currently Spring Cloud, which uses Netflix OSS for most part, is independent of AWS.

我制作了一个小的POC，如果需要，您可以在此处查看

I have made a small POC that you can check out here if want.

这篇关于为什么客户端负载均衡器会像Ribbon一样?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！