为什么纯文本技术文章经常在反引号和单引号中包含术语? [英] Why do plain-text technical articles often enclose terms within backticks and single quotes?

查看:90
本文介绍了为什么纯文本技术文章经常在反引号和单引号中包含术语?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我喜欢从网络上保存有用的大量文本页面的本地副本,因此我可以通过修改标记以包括CSS来练习改善其外观.

I like to save local copies of useful text-heavy pages from the web so I can practice improving their appearance by modifying the markup to include CSS.

我注意到页面上的某些文本通常以`和'分隔.

I've noticed that some text on the pages is often delimited by ` and '.

这是否有充分的理由?如果我认为这些引号有充分的理由,我想使用脚本自动进行修改.例如,它是特定创作工具的副产品吗?

Is there a good reason for this? I'd like to do my modifications automatically with a script if I thought these quotes were there for a good reason. Is it, for example, a byproduct of a particular authoring tool?

我尝试搜索此内容,但是搜索引擎将其视为空字符串或不完整字符串,并且未给出有意义的结果.

I have tried to search for this, but search engines treat it like empty or incomplete strings and don't give meaningful results.

单引号示例(`)可以在Eric Raymond的

A single quote example (` ') can be found in Eric Raymond's Cathedral and the Bazaar:

问题是这样的:假设洛克上一个叫乔"的人给我发了邮件.如果我将邮件取回snark,然后尝试回复,则我的邮寄者会乐意尝试将其发送到snark上不存在的"joe".手动编辑回复地址以添加到@ ccil.org很快就变得很痛苦.

The problem was this: suppose someone named `joe' on locke sent me mail. If I fetched the mail to snark and then tried to reply to it, my mailer would cheerfully try to ship it to a nonexistent `joe' on snark. Hand-editing reply addresses to tack on `@ccil.org' quickly got to be a serious pain.

推荐答案

埃里克·雷蒙德(Eric Raymond)的论文示例是Unicode以前时代人们试图通过不再使用约定来改进"其文字排版的典型示例抓住.典型的引用样式为`'.它也用于LaTeX(自动将其转换为正确的印刷单引号‘’).

The example of Eric Raymond’s essay is a typical example of people from pre-Unicode eras trying to "improve" the typograph of their text by using conventions that no longer hold. The quoting style `' is typical of that. It’s also used in LaTeX (which automatically converts it to correct typographical single quotes ‘’).

您也可以在Eric的文章中看到其他ASCII工件:例如,他使用"--"而不是正确的"破折号""(很多人都这样做,因为破折号没有在默认的Windows键盘上不存在.)

You can see other ASCII artifacts in Eric’s essay, too: for example, he uses "--" instead of a "correct" dash "" (an awful lot of people do this, since the dash doesn’t exist on default Windows keyboards).

因此,这是从不广泛支持Unicode字体(或者通常是:缺乏这些印刷功能的字体)开始的时代.

As such, it’s an anachronism from a time where support for Unicode fonts (or generally: fonts lacking these typographical features) wasn’t widespread.

这篇关于为什么纯文本技术文章经常在反引号和单引号中包含术语?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆