Rails 3.1,缺少局部局部变量的内存泄漏(Ruby 1.9.2-p290) [英] Rails 3.1, memory leak for missing local partial variables (Ruby 1.9.2-p290)

查看:94
本文介绍了Rails 3.1,缺少局部局部变量的内存泄漏(Ruby 1.9.2-p290)的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

如果我这样渲染局部图像:

If I render a partial like so:

=渲染:partial =>"event_news_item",:object => event,:variable => true

= render :partial => "event_news_item", :object => event, :variable => true

然后在触发内存泄漏的部分中引用变量.似乎rails进入了递归过程.然后,我必须迅速重新启动我的服务器,然后内存使用率才会失控.

And then reference variable in the partial a memory leak is triggered. It seems rails goes into a recursion. I have to then quickly restart my server before memory usage spirals out of control.

有人知道为什么在这里触发内存泄漏吗?谁能在自己的计算机上确认这一点?

如果我这样做

=渲染:partial =>"event_news_item",:object =>事件

= render :partial => "event_news_item", :object => event

尝试在局部变量中引用变量时,会正确引发错误.

An error is raised correctly when trying to reference variable in the partial.

(顺便说一句,正确的方法是

(The correct way of doing this by the way is

=渲染:partial =>"event_news_item",:object => event,:locals => {:variable => true})

= render :partial => "event_news_item", :object => event, :locals => { :variable => true })

推荐答案

在相似的环境中,我看到了非常糟糕的内存泄漏.我已经将其跟踪到看起来很天真的关联获取(准确地说是comment.author),然后尝试对其进行调试了一段时间,最后放弃并运行了1.9.3-rc1.

I have seen a really bad memory leak in similar environment. I've tracked it to the innocently looking association fetch (comment.author, to be precise), then tried to debug it for some time, and finally gave up and ran on 1.9.3-rc1.

令人惊讶的是,这修复了此特定的内存泄漏,而且将独角兽的启动大小减少了15M(从85M减少到70M; i386).

Surprisingly, that fixed this particular memory leak, and, moreover, reduced the unicorns' startup size by 15M (from 85M to 70M; i386).

这篇关于Rails 3.1,缺少局部局部变量的内存泄漏(Ruby 1.9.2-p290)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆