在svg文件中添加版权声明的语义正确方法? [英] Semantically correct way to add a copyright notice into a svg file?
问题描述
我想在我的svg文件中添加版权声明,并且该声明应仅为隐藏"文本,而不能带有水印. 这并不是真正的保护,因为如果您使用文本编辑器打开svg文件,则可以编辑所有内容并删除版权.但是我认为这将是一种简单而又很好的显示方式,显示谁制作了该文件,并且如果有一些隐藏的信息,并且如果您正在寻找它,则可以很容易地找到未经许可的图形.
我的主要问题是:应如何将版权文本放入文件中?
-
<title>
元素用于辅助功能,某些用户代理将title元素显示为工具提示. -
<desc>
元素通常可以提高可访问性,您应该描述用户将会看到的内容. - 丑陋的方式:使用嵌入式CSS将其隐藏的文本元素.甚至不要考虑这一点! :)
-
<!--Copyright info here-->
可能也是一个简单的解决方案. -
<metadata>
:这是最好的方法,但是我没有找到详细的定义以及哪些子元素可以存在于其中.另外 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/DOM/SVGMetadataElement给出404. 在https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html #MetadataElement 我们可以找到更多详细信息.但是,RDF真的有必要吗?
我认为<metadata>
元素是正确的位置,但是应该使用哪些子元素,而只是RDF是可行的方式?
我认为 在此示例中,我使用Schema.org中的 适用于此内容的许可文档,通常由URL指示. (词汇表Schema.org得到了几个大型搜索引擎的支持.) I want to add a copyright notice in my svg files and it should be only "hidden" text and no watermark.
This is no real protection, because if you open a svg file with a text editor you can edit everything and delete the copyright. But I think this would be a simple and great way to show, who has made the file and a possible chance to find unlicensed graphics if there is some hidden information and if you are looking for it you can easily find it. My main question is: how should the copyright text be put into the file? I think a I think the But I think it makes sense to use RDF here, because that’s exactly RDF’s job (providing metadata about resources, like SVG documents), and there is probably no other XML-based metadata language that has greater reach / better support. A simple RDF statement (in RDF/XML) could look like this: The In this example I use the A license document that applies to this content, typically indicated by URL. (The vocabulary Schema.org is supported by several big search engines.) 这篇关于在svg文件中添加版权声明的语义正确方法?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!metadata
元素是此处的正确选择.它必须包含XML,但没有必须是RDF序列化(例如, <metadata>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/my-svg-file.svg">
<schema:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata>
about
属性将IRI作为值;对于独立的SVG文档,您可以提供一个空值(=文档的基本IRI).license
属性:
<title>
element is for accessibility purposes, some user agents display the title element as a tooltip.<desc>
element generally improves accessibility and you should describe what a user would see.<!--Copyright info here-->
could be also a simple solution.<metadata>
: this would the best way but I did not find a detailed definition and which child elements could live inside. Also https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/DOM/SVGMetadataElement gives a 404.
Under https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#MetadataElement we can find more details. But is RDF really necessary?<metadata>
element is the right place, but which child elements should be used and is just RDF the way to go?metadata
element is the correct choice here. It has to contain XML, but it doesn’t have to be a RDF serialization (e.g., RDF/XML). <metadata>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/my-svg-file.svg">
<schema:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata>
about
attribute takes an IRI as value; for a stand-alone SVG document, you could provide an empty value (= the base IRI of the document).license
property from Schema.org: