哪种类型对方法的“自我"参数有效? [英] What types are valid for the `self` parameter of a method?
问题描述
我想创建一种仅在self
参数为Rc
的情况下起作用的方法.我看到可以使用Box
,所以我想我可以尝试模仿它的工作原理:
I wanted to create a method that only works where the self
parameter was an Rc
. I saw that I could use Box
, so I thought I might try to mimic how that works:
use std::rc::Rc;
use std::sync::Arc;
struct Bar;
impl Bar {
fn consuming(self) {}
fn reference(&self) {}
fn mutable_reference(&mut self) {}
fn boxed(self: Box<Bar>) {}
fn ref_count(self: Rc<Bar>) {}
fn atomic_ref_count(self: Arc<Bar>) {}
}
fn main() {}
产生这些错误:
error[E0308]: mismatched method receiver
--> a.rs:11:18
|
11 | fn ref_count(self: Rc<Bar>) {}
| ^^^^ expected struct `Bar`, found struct `std::rc::Rc`
|
= note: expected type `Bar`
= note: found type `std::rc::Rc<Bar>`
error[E0308]: mismatched method receiver
--> a.rs:12:25
|
12 | fn atomic_ref_count(self: Arc<Bar>) {}
| ^^^^ expected struct `Bar`, found struct `std::sync::Arc`
|
= note: expected type `Bar`
= note: found type `std::sync::Arc<Bar>`
这是Rust 1.15.1的版本.
This is with Rust 1.15.1.
推荐答案
在Rust 1.33之前,只有四个有效的方法接收者:
Before Rust 1.33, there are only four valid method receivers:
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
fn by_val(self: Foo) {} // a.k.a. by_val(self)
fn by_ref(self: &Foo) {} // a.k.a. by_ref(&self)
fn by_mut_ref(self: &mut Foo) {} // a.k.a. by_mut_ref(&mut self)
fn by_box(self: Box<Foo>) {} // no short form
}
fn main() {}
最初,Rust没有这种明确的self
形式,仅self
,&self
,&mut self
和~self
(Box
的旧名称).进行了更改,以使仅按值和按引用具有简短的内置语法,因为它们是常见情况,并且具有非常关键的语言属性,而所有智能指针(包括Box
)都需要显式形式
Originally, Rust didn't have this explicit self
form, only self
, &self
, &mut self
and ~self
(the old name for Box
). This changed so that only by-value and by-references have the short-hand built-in syntax, since they are the common cases, and have very key language properties, while all smart pointers (including Box
) require the explicit form.
从Rust 1.33开始,一些其他选定类型可用作self
:
As of Rust 1.33, some additional selected types are available for use as self
:
-
Rc
-
Arc
-
Pin
Rc
Arc
Pin
这意味着原始示例现在可以工作:
This means that the original example now works:
use std::{rc::Rc, sync::Arc};
struct Bar;
impl Bar {
fn consuming(self) { println!("self") }
fn reference(&self) { println!("&self") }
fn mut_reference(&mut self) { println!("&mut self") }
fn boxed(self: Box<Bar>) { println!("Box") }
fn ref_count(self: Rc<Bar>) { println!("Rc") }
fn atomic_ref_count(self: Arc<Bar>) { println!("Arc") }
}
fn main() {
Bar.consuming();
Bar.reference();
Bar.mut_reference();
Box::new(Bar).boxed();
Rc::new(Bar).ref_count();
Arc::new(Bar).atomic_ref_count();
}
但是,尚未完全归纳impl
处理以匹配语法,因此用户创建的类型仍然不起作用.正在功能标记arbitrary_self_types
上取得进展,并且正在跟踪中进行讨论问题44874 .
However, the impl
handling hasn't yet been fully generalised to match the syntax, so user-created types still don't work. Progress on this is being made under the feature flag arbitrary_self_types
and discussion is taking place in the tracking issue 44874.
(期待的事情!)
这篇关于哪种类型对方法的“自我"参数有效?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!