将角色混合到可调用对象中 [英] Mixing roles into callables
问题描述
从理论上讲,您可以在运行时将角色混入对象中..因此,我正在尝试使用以下功能:
Theoretically, you can mix in a role into an object in runtime. So I am trying to do this with a function:
my &random-f = -> $arg { "Just $arg" };
say random-f("boo");
role Argable {
method argh() {
self.CALL-ME( "argh" );
}
}
&random-f does Argable;
say random-f.argh;
在该角色中,我使用self
来引用已经定义的功能,并且 CALL-ME
来实际调用角色内的函数.但是,这导致以下错误:
Within the role, I use self
to refer to the already defined function, and CALL-ME
to actually call the function within the role. However, this results in the following error:
Too few positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 0
in block <unit> at self-call-me.p6 line 5
我真的不知道谁期待1个论点.从理论上讲,它应该是CALL-ME
函数,但是谁知道呢.消除self.
会产生不同的错误:CALL-ME used at line 11
.将does Callable
添加到Argable
(将自身放回原位)会导致相同的错误.能做到吗?有什么想法吗?
I really have no idea who's expecting 1 argument. Theoretically, it should be the CALL-ME
function, but who knows. Eliminating the self.
yields a different error: CALL-ME used at line 11
. Adding does Callable
to Argable
(after putting self back) results in the same error. Can this be done? Any idea of how?
推荐答案
您的代码中有两点不正确:
There's two things incorrect in your code:
say random-f.argh; # *call* random-f and then call .argh on the result
您要在Callable
上呼叫.argh
,因此:
say &random-f.argh;
第二,您应该只能调用self
:您可以在.argh
方法的签名中对其进行调整:
Secondly, you should just be able to call self
: you can tweak this in the signature of the .argh
method:
method argh(&self:) {
因此最终代码变为:
my &random-f = -> $arg { "Just $arg" };
say random-f("boo");
role Argable {
method argh(&self:) {
self( "argh" );
}
}
&random-f does Argable;
say &random-f.argh;
这篇关于将角色混合到可调用对象中的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!