顺序使用stat和mkdir的竞赛条件 [英] Race condition with stat and mkdir in sequence
问题描述
Coverage抱怨. toctou:调用检查函数后使用DIR的函数mkdir.这可能会导致检查时间,使用时间竞争状况
Coverity complains of . toctou: Calling function mkdir that uses DIR after a check function. This can cause a time-of-check, time-of-use race condition
if (stat(DIR, &st) != 0)
{
if (mkdir(DIR, 0755) < 0)
{
return ERROR;
}
}
将代码更改为是否足够好,我仅将stat用于文件是否存在检查
Is it good enough to change the code to ,I was using stat only for file exist check
if (mkdir(NDUID_DIR, 0755) < 0)
{
if(errno != EEXIST)
{
return ERROR;
}
}
是否有更好的方法来修复代码?
Is there a better way to fix the code?
推荐答案
您的两个摘录似乎都不正确和/或不完整.
Both of your snippets appear to be incorrect and/or incomplete.
在OpenBSD上, sys_mkdir
将return
errno
设置为 EEXIST
存在.但是,这不能保证目标文件是目录-现有的常规文件仍会导致 mkdir(2)
返回完全相同的EEXIST
.
On OpenBSD, sys_mkdir
would return
-1
, and set errno
to EEXIST
when the target file is present. However, that doesn't guarantee that the target file is a directory -- an existing regular file would still result in mkdir(2)
returning the exact same EEXIST
.
要获得广泛接受的方法的指导,请查看 mkdir(1)
-p
选项如何在BSD上实现( bin/mkdir/mkdir.c#mkpath
在OpenBSD中和 NetBSD ),所有这些都位于 stat(2)
以随后运行 S_ISDIR
宏,以确保现有文件是目录,而不仅仅是其他任何类型的文件.
For guidance of the widely accepted approach, take a look at how mkdir(1)
-p
option is implemented across the BSDs (bin/mkdir/mkdir.c#mkpath
in OpenBSD and NetBSD), all of which, on mkdir(2)
's error, appear to immediately call stat(2)
to subsequently run the S_ISDIR
macro to ensure that the existing file is a directory, and not just any other type of a file.
这篇关于顺序使用stat和mkdir的竞赛条件的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!