如何使用Condvar限制多线程? [英] How do I use a Condvar to limit multithreading?

查看:184
本文介绍了如何使用Condvar限制多线程?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在尝试使用Condvar来限制在任何给定时间处于活动状态的线程数.我很难找到有关如何使用Condvar的良好示例.到目前为止,我有:

I'm trying to use a Condvar to limit the number of threads that are active at any given time. I'm having a hard time finding good examples on how to use Condvar. So far I have:

use std::sync::{Arc, Condvar, Mutex};
use std::thread;

fn main() {
    let thread_count_arc = Arc::new((Mutex::new(0), Condvar::new()));
    let mut i = 0;
    while i < 100 {
        let thread_count = thread_count_arc.clone();
        thread::spawn(move || {
            let &(ref num, ref cvar) = &*thread_count;
            {
                let mut start = num.lock().unwrap();
                if *start >= 20 {
                    cvar.wait(start);
                }
                *start += 1;
            }
            println!("hello");
            cvar.notify_one();
        });
        i += 1;
    }
}

给出的编译器错误是:

error[E0382]: use of moved value: `start`
  --> src/main.rs:16:18
   |
14 |                     cvar.wait(start);
   |                               ----- value moved here
15 |                 }
16 |                 *start += 1;
   |                  ^^^^^ value used here after move
   |
   = note: move occurs because `start` has type `std::sync::MutexGuard<'_, i32>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait

我完全不确定我对Condvar的使用是否正确.我尝试尽可能地接近Rust API上的示例.难道是实现此目标的正确方法吗?

I'm entirely unsure if my use of Condvar is correct. I tried staying as close as I could to the example on the Rust API. Wwat is the proper way to implement this?

推荐答案

以下是可编译的版本:

use std::{
    sync::{Arc, Condvar, Mutex},
    thread,
};

fn main() {
    let thread_count_arc = Arc::new((Mutex::new(0u8), Condvar::new()));
    let mut i = 0;
    while i < 100 {
        let thread_count = thread_count_arc.clone();
        thread::spawn(move || {
            let (num, cvar) = &*thread_count;

            let mut start = cvar
                .wait_while(num.lock().unwrap(), |start| *start >= 20)
                .unwrap();

            // Before Rust 1.42, use this:
            //
            // let mut start = num.lock().unwrap();
            // while *start >= 20 {
            //     start = cvar.wait(start).unwrap()
            // }

            *start += 1;

            println!("hello");
            cvar.notify_one();
        });
        i += 1;
    }
}

重要的部分可以从 Condvar::wait_while Condvar::wait :

The important part can be seen from the signature of Condvar::wait_while or Condvar::wait:

pub fn wait_while<'a, T, F>(
    &self,
    guard: MutexGuard<'a, T>,
    condition: F
) -> LockResult<MutexGuard<'a, T>>
where
    F: FnMut(&mut T) -> bool, 

pub fn wait<'a, T>(
    &self,
    guard: MutexGuard<'a, T>
) -> LockResult<MutexGuard<'a, T>>

这表示wait_while/wait 消费 guard,这就是为什么您得到自己所犯的错误的原因-您不再拥有start,因此无法调用任何方法都可以!

This says that wait_while / wait consumes the guard, which is why you get the error you did - you no longer own start, so you can't call any methods on it!

这些函数在反映Condvar的工作方式方面做得非常好-您暂时放弃对Mutex(由start表示)的锁定,当函数返回时,您将再次获得锁定

Theses functions are doing a great job of reflecting how Condvars work - you give up the lock on the Mutex (represented by start) for a while, and when the function returns you get the lock again.

解决方法是放弃锁,然后从wait_while/wait获取锁保护返回值.我还从if切换到了while,如

The fix is to give up the lock and then grab the lock guard return value from wait_while / wait. I've also switched from an if to a while, as encouraged by huon.

这篇关于如何使用Condvar限制多线程?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆