在字段名称周围使用反引号 [英] Using backticks around field names

查看:77
本文介绍了在字段名称周围使用反引号的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在阅读了一些有关SQL问题的答案和评论之后,还听说我的一个朋友在一个禁止他们使用的政策的地方工作,我想知道在现场使用反引号是否有问题MySQL中的名称.

After reading a couple of answers and comments on some SQL questions here, and also hearing that a friend of mine works at a place which has a policy which bans them, I'm wondering if there's anything wrong with using backticks around field names in MySQL.

也就是说:

SELECT `id`, `name`, `anotherfield` ...
-- vs --
SELECT id, name, anotherfield ...

推荐答案

使用反引号允许您使用其他字符.在查询书写中,这不是问题,但是如果有人假设您可以使用反引号,那么我认为它可以让您摆脱诸如

Using backticks permits you to use alternative characters. In query writing it's not such a problem, but if one assumes you can just use backticks, I would assume it lets you get away with ridiculous stuff like

SELECT `id`, `my name`, `another field` , `field,with,comma` 

当然会生成名称错误的表.

Which does of course generate badly named tables.

如果您只是为了简洁起见,我认为没有问题, 您会注意到,如果您这样运行查询

If you're just being concise I don't see a problem with it, you'll note if you run your query as such

EXPLAIN EXTENDED Select foo,bar,baz 

返回的生成警告将带有完全合格的表名.因此,如果您使用查询生成功能和自动重写查询,则反引号会使解析您的代码的任何事情都变得不那么混乱.

The generated warning that comes back will have back-ticks and fully qualified table names. So if you're using query generation features and automated re-writing of queries, backticks would make anything parsing your code less confused.

但是,我认为,与其强制您是否可以使用反引号,不如说它们应该有一个名称标准.它解决了更多的实际"问题.

I think however, instead of mandating whether or not you can use backticks, they should have a standard for names. It solves more 'real' problems.

这篇关于在字段名称周围使用反引号的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆