哪个更快-INSTR还是LIKE? [英] Which is faster — INSTR or LIKE?

问题描述

如果您的目标是测试MySQL列中是否存在字符串(类型为'varchar'，'text'，'blob'等)，那么以下哪一项是更快/更有效/更好地使用，以及为什么?

If your goal is to test if a string exists in a MySQL column (of type 'varchar', 'text', 'blob', etc) which of the following is faster / more efficient / better to use, and why?

或者，还有其他方法可以使这两个方法中的任何一个更重要吗?

Or, is there some other method that tops either of these?

INSTR( columnname, 'mystring' ) > 0

vs

columnname LIKE '%mystring%'

正如kibibu在上述评论中指出的那样，

推荐答案

FULLTEXT搜索绝对会更快.

FULLTEXT searches are absolutely going to be faster, as kibibu noted in the comments above.

但是:

mysql> select COUNT(ID) FROM table WHERE INSTR(Name,'search') > 0;
+-----------+
| COUNT(ID) |
+-----------+
|     40735 | 
+-----------+
1 row in set (5.54 sec)

mysql> select COUNT(ID) FROM table WHERE Name LIKE '%search%';
+-----------+
| COUNT(ID) |
+-----------+
|     40735 | 
+-----------+
1 row in set (5.54 sec)

在我的测试中，它们的表现完全相同.它们都不区分大小写，并且通常会执行全表扫描，这在处理高性能MySQL时通常是禁止的.

In my tests, they perform exactly the same. They are both case-insensitive, and generally they perform full-table scans, a general no-no when dealing with high-performance MySQL.

除非您要对索引列进行前缀搜索:

Unless you are doing a prefix search on an indexed column:

mysql> select COUNT(ID) FROM table WHERE Name LIKE 'search%';
+-----------+
| COUNT(ID) |
+-----------+
|         7 | 
+-----------+
1 row in set (3.88 sec)

在这种情况下，仅带有后缀通配符的LIKE要快得多.

In which case, the LIKE with only a suffix wildcard is much faster.

这篇关于哪个更快-INSTR还是LIKE?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！