为什么我在这根管子上弄垃圾? [英] Why I'm getting trash on this pipe?

查看:75
本文介绍了为什么我在这根管子上弄垃圾?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在运行在Oracle网站上找到的全双工服务器/客户端代码:

I'm running a full-duplex server/client code I found on Oracle's website:

在编写./fd_client时哈哈哈,我得到类似的东西:

When writing ./fd_client hahaha I get something like:

HAHAHA0 $0

大写是可以的(这是它应该返回的服务器),但是,如何避免这种尾随的垃圾呢?

The upper case is OK (it's what the server it's supposed to return) but, how the hell do I avoid that trailing trash?

fd_client.c

fd_client.c

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include "fullduplex.h" /* For name of the named-pipe */


int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    int wrfd, rdfd, numread;
    char rdbuf[MAX_BUF_SIZE];

    /* Check if an argument was specified. */

    if (argc != 2) {
        printf("Usage : %s \n", argv[0]);
        exit (0);
    }

    /* Open the first named pipe for writing */
    wrfd = open(NP1, O_WRONLY);

    /* Open the second named pipe for reading */
    rdfd = open(NP2, O_RDONLY);

    /* Write to the pipe */
    write(wrfd, argv[1], strlen(argv[1]));

    /* Read from the pipe */
    numread = read(rdfd, rdbuf, MAX_BUF_SIZE);

    rdbuf[numread] = '0';

    printf("Full Duplex Client : Read From the  Pipe : %s\n", rdbuf);

    return 0;
}

fd_server.c

fd_server.c

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include "fullduplex.h" /* For name of the named-pipe */

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    int rdfd, wrfd, ret_val, count, numread;
    char buf[MAX_BUF_SIZE];

    /* Create the first named - pipe */
    ret_val = mkfifo(NP1, 0666);

    if ((ret_val == -1) && (errno != EEXIST)) {
        perror("Error creating the named pipe");
        exit (0);
    }

    ret_val = mkfifo(NP2, 0666);

    if ((ret_val == -1) && (errno != EEXIST)) {
        perror("Error creating the named pipe");
        exit (0);
    }

    /* Open the first named pipe for reading */
    rdfd = open(NP1, O_RDONLY);

    /* Open the second named pipe for writing */
    wrfd = open(NP2, O_WRONLY);

    /* Read from the first pipe */
    numread = read(rdfd, buf, MAX_BUF_SIZE);

    buf[numread] = '0';

    printf("Full Duplex Server : Read From the pipe : %s \n", buf);

    /* Convert to the string to upper case */
    count = 0;
    while (count < numread) {
        buf[count] = toupper(buf[count]);
        count++;
    }

    /* 
     * Write the converted string back to the second 
     * pipe 
     */    
    write(wrfd, buf, strlen(buf));
}

fullduplex.h

fullduplex.h

#define NP1     "/tmp/np1"
#define NP2     "/tmp/np2"
#define MAX_BUF_SIZE    255

推荐答案

此:

buf[numread] = '0';

是错误的.您想要:

buf[numread] = '\0';

(与rdbuf[numread] = '0';相同.)

这篇关于为什么我在这根管子上弄垃圾?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆