在这里使用@property时,为什么PyCharm会发出警告? [英] Why does PyCharm raise a warning when using @property here?
问题描述
在教程中,出于使用@property的目的,我看到了两种类型的实例属性命名.这是显示两者示例的代码.它们的工作方式也似乎有所不同.
In tutorials I have seen two types of instance attribute naming for the purpose of using @property. Here is code showing examples of both. They also seem to work differently.
class A:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
@property
def x(self):
return self.__x
@x.setter
def x(self, x):
if x > 1000:
self.__x = 1000
else:
self.__x = x # Instance attribute __x defined outside __init__
class B:
def __init__(self, x):
self._x = x
@property
def x(self):
return self._x
@x.setter
def x(self, x):
if x > 1000:
self._x = 1000
else:
self._x = x
a = A(9999)
print(a.x) # -> 1000
b = B(9999) # -> 9999
print(b.x)
b.x = 9999
print(b.x) # -> 1000
我更喜欢A类的行为,因为@ x.setter似乎在__init__中立即使用,但是那段代码在PyCharm中给了我警告(我将其作为注释).如果正确使用Python的属性设置器,为什么会出现警告? B类中没有警告.我能以某种方式在__init__中以与A类中相同的方式调用@ x.setter而不发出警告吗?
I like the behaviour of class A better as it seems that the @x.setter is used immediately in __init__, however that piece of code gives me a warning in PyCharm (I have it as a comment). Why would there be a warning if that is the proper use of a Python's property setter? There are no warnings in class B. Could I somehow call @x.setter in __init__ the same way as in class A without a warning?
推荐答案
It seems to be a bug in PyCharm: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/PY-25263.
我发现的一个临时解决方案是在__init__中添加self._x = None.因此代码将是:
A temporary solution I found was to add self._x = None in the __init__. So the code would be:
class A:
def __init__(self, x):
self._x = None
self.x = x
@property
def x(self):
return self._x
@x.setter
def x(self, x):
if x > 1000:
self._x = 1000
else:
self._x = x
a = A(9999)
print(a.x) # -> 1000
这篇关于在这里使用@property时,为什么PyCharm会发出警告?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!