如何强制NHibernate不更新集合中的所有对象 [英] How to force NHibernate not to update all objects in collection
问题描述
如果仅更改集合中的每个元素,如何强制NHibernate不为集合中的每个元素生成UPDATE.在这里:
How to force NHibernate not to generate UPDATE for each element in collection if I change only one element of that collection. Here it is:
internal class Master
{
private int _id;
public string Name { get; set; }
public ISet<Slave> Slaves { get; set; }
public Master()
{
Slaves = new HashedSet<Slave>();
}
}
internal class Slave
{
private int _id;
public string Name { get; set; }
public Master Master { get; set; }
}
映射:
<class name="nHibernateTutorials.Slave, nHibernateTutorials" lazy="false">
<id access="field" name="_id" column="id">
<generator class="native"/>
</id>
<property access="property" name="Name" column="name"/>
<many-to-one access="property" name="Master" column="master"/>
</class>
<class name="nHibernateTutorials.Master, nHibernateTutorials" lazy="false">
<id access="field" name="_id" column="id">
<generator class="native"/>
</id>
<property access="property" name="Name" column="name"/>
<set access="property" name="Slaves" cascade="save-update">
<key column="master"/>
<one-to-many class="nHibernateTutorials.Slave, nHibernateTutorials"/>
</set>
</class>
用于更新集合元素的代码:
Code that updates collection element:
Master m = new Master {Name = "Kenny"};
Slave s1 = new Slave { Name = "Cartman", Master = m};
m.Slaves.Add(s1);
Slave s2 = new Slave {Name = "Kyle", Master = m};
m.Slaves.Add(s2);
Slave s3 = new Slave {Name = "Stan", Master = m};
m.Slaves.Add(s3);
DbManager.SaveObject(m);
s1.Name = "Daisy";
DbManager.SaveObject(m);
DbManager.SaveObject中的代码只是打开新会话并使用SaveOrUpdate来更新对象.
Code in DbManager.SaveObject simply opens new session and uses SaveOrUpdate to update object.
如果我更改master的Slaves集合中的元素之一,然后尝试更新master,则NHibernate会生成SQL以更新Slaves集合中的所有元素.但是我只需要更新一个元素.
If I change one of the elements from the Slaves collection of master and then try to update master, NHibernate generates SQL for updating all elements in Slaves collection. But I need to update only one element.
谢谢.
推荐答案
您可能会看到多余的多对一更新.在映射一对多集合时,必须选择关系的所有者.在您的示例中,双方的双方都认为自己拥有它!
You're probably seeing superfluous many-to-one updates. When you're mapping one-to-many collections, you must choose which side is the owner of the relationship. In your example, both sides of the relationship think they own it!
您需要使用inverse="true"
将属性添加到您的set元素中.该指令告诉NHibernate不要从关系的那一端开始更新集合.
You need to add an attribute to your set element, with inverse="true"
. That directive tells NHibernate not to update the collection from that end of the relationship.
这篇关于如何强制NHibernate不更新集合中的所有对象的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!