组合相同类型的'n'个可观察对象(RxJava) [英] Combining 'n' Observables of the same type (RxJava)

查看:74
本文介绍了组合相同类型的'n'个可观察对象(RxJava)的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个代码流,可生成相同类型的Oberable的Iterable.然后,我将它们全部进行遍历,将它们组合在一起并以Observable的形式返回结果.目前,我正在使用带有FuncN的zip文件,这似乎太糟糕了,我想我已经错过了重点.这是一个使用Map的示例,这显然是胡说八道,但您明白了.

I have a code flow that generates an Iterable of Observables of the same type. I then go through them all, combining them and returning the result as an Observable. At the moment I'm using zip with a FuncN, which seems horrible and I think I've missed the point somewhere. Here's an example that uses a Map, it's obviously nonsense but you get the idea.

final ImmutableList.Builder<Map<String, Object>> observables = 
        ImmutableList.builder();
for (String key: keys) {
    if (someTest(key)) {
        observables.add(generateObservableMap(key));
    }
}

return Observable.zip(observables.build(), data -> {
    final Map<String, Object> result = Maps.newHashMap();

    // THIS IS REALLY UGLY
    for (Object d: data) {
        for (Object e: ((Map) d).entrySet()) {
            final Map.Entry entry = (Map.Entry) e;
            final String key = (Model) entry.getKey();
            final Object value = (AuthData) entry.getValue();
            result.put(key, value);
        }
    }

    return ImmutableMap.copyOf(result);
});

我敢肯定有更好的方法.

I'm sure there's a better way of doing this.

推荐答案

这实际上是关于Java集合的问题,而不是关于RxJava的问题.您可以使用putAll将标记为REALLY UGLY的部分变得更好一点:

This is actually more a question about Java Collections than about RxJava. The part that you labelled as REALLY UGLY can be made a bit nicer using putAll:

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <K, V> Map<K, V> mergeMaps(Object... maps) {
    final Map<K, V> result = new HashMap<K, V>();
    for (Object map: maps) {
        // unchecked <K,V> require @SuppressWarnings
        result.putAll((Map<K,V>)map);
    }
    return result;
}

请注意,如果在多个地图中出现相同的键,则结果中只会包含该键的最后一个值.

Notice that if the same key occurs in several maps, only the last value for it will be in the result.

您可能想知道为什么我选择Object...作为参数类型而不是Map<K,V>....原因是FuncN将具有一个Object[],无法将其强制转换为Map<K,V>[],因为即使数组中的所有元素均为Map类型,也会抛出一个ClassCastException.

You may wonder why I chose Object... as argument type instead of Map<K,V>.... The reason is that FuncN will have an Object[], which cannot be cast to a Map<K,V>[], because this would throw a ClassCastException, even if all elements in the array are of type Map.

现在,如果Iterable<Observable<Map<String, Object>>>中有一些sampleObservables,则可以按以下方式使用zipmergeMaps:

Now if you have some sampleObservables inside an Iterable<Observable<Map<String, Object>>>, you can use zip and mergeMaps as follows:

return Observable.zip(sampleObservables, new FuncN<Map<String, Object>>() {
    public Map<String, Object> call(Object... args) {
        return mergeMaps(args);
    }
});

这篇关于组合相同类型的'n'个可观察对象(RxJava)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆