软件设备是否可以隐藏您正在使用开源的事实? [英] Are software appliances a way to hide the fact that you are using open source?
问题描述
我正在意识到一种趋势，那就是在广泛使用开放源代码时，您应该使用软件设备，因为它提供了一种避免客户询问其开发方式的方法.
I am perceiving a trend that says you should pursue software appliances whenever you are extensively using open source as it provides a method to avoiding your customers ask how it was developed.
如果客户发现您要向他们收取大量费用，却使用了许多免费的开放源代码，那么与他们根本无法解决问题时相比，他们将希望进行更深入的谈判.
If a customer sees that you are charging them a lot of money yet used lots of free open source then they will want to negotiate more deeply than if they cannot peak inside the box at all.
还有其他人也观察到同样的趋势吗?
Is anyone else observing this same trend?
推荐答案
我似乎至少记得一种情况，制造商使用调整后的 OSS作为其设备的基础.当它被发现并被要求提供源代码时，他们提出了异议.随后法院采取行动，最终达成和解.
I seem to recall at least one case where a manufacturer used tweaked OSS as the base for their appliance. When it was discovered and they were pressed for the source code they demurred. Court action follow and a settlement was eventually reached.
大概他们想出售一种增值"产品，而不必将商品赠予竞争对手.
Presumably they wanted to sell a "value added" product without having to give the goodies to their competitors.
::搜索网络::
不止一种情况:
- SFLC files GPL lawsuit on behalf of Busybox developers
- Verizon Settles BusyBox Suit
- Xterasys Agrees to Settle BusyBox Suit
看来，busybox就是全部，还有一袋筹码...
It would appear that busybox is all that and a bag of chips...
无论如何，所有这些表明，任何想在软件设备中隐藏OSS用途的人都可能要三思而后行.如果那些肮脏的嬉皮黑客类型可以将Verizon带到解决桌上，那么他们也可以带您.
Anyway, all this suggests that anyone thinking of trying to hide the use of OSS in a software appliance might want to think twice. If those dirty hippie hacker types could bring Verizon to the settlement table they can bring you, too.
这篇关于软件设备是否可以隐藏您正在使用开源的事实?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
