快速计算此numpy查询的方法 [英] Fast way to compute this numpy query

查看:121
本文介绍了快速计算此numpy查询的方法的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个长度为n的布尔值numpy数组mask.我还有一个长度为< = nnumpy数组a,包含从0(包括)到n-1(包括)的数字,并且不包含重复项.我要计算的查询是np.array([x for x in a if mask[x]]),但我认为这不是最快的方法.

I have a boolean numpy array mask of length n. I also have a numpy array a of length <= n, containing numbers ranging from 0 (inclusive) to n-1 (inclusive), and it contains no duplicates. The query I want to compute is np.array([x for x in a if mask[x]]), but I don't think it's the fastest way to do it.

numpy中,有没有比我刚才写的方法更快的方法?

Is there a faster way of doing this in numpy than the way I just wrote?

推荐答案

最快的方法似乎就是a[mask[a]].我写了一个快速测试,显示了两种方法在速度上的差异,这取决于蒙版的覆盖率p(真实项的数量/n).

It looks like the fastest way to do this is simply a[mask[a]]. I wrote a quick test which shows the difference in speed of the two methods depending on the coverage of the mask, p (the number of true items / n).

import timeit
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
n = 10000
p = 0.25
slow_times = []
fast_times = []
p_space = np.linspace(0, 1, 100)
for p in p_space:
    mask = np.random.choice([True, False], n, p=[p, 1 - p])
    a = np.arange(n)
    np.random.shuffle(a)
    y = np.array([x for x in a if mask[x]])
    z = a[mask[a]]
    n_test = 100
    t1 = timeit.timeit(lambda: np.array([x for x in a if mask[x]]), number=n_test)
    t2 = timeit.timeit(lambda: a[mask[a]], number=n_test)
    slow_times.append(t1)
    fast_times.append(t2)
plt.plot(p_space, slow_times, label='slow')
plt.plot(p_space, fast_times, label='fast')
plt.xlabel('p (# true items in mask)')
plt.ylabel('time (ms)')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Speed of method vs. coverage of mask')
plt.show()

哪个给了我这个情节

因此,无论蒙版的覆盖范围如何,此方法都快得多.

So this method is a whole lot faster regardless of the coverage of mask.

这篇关于快速计算此numpy查询的方法的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆