Oracle很难在简单任务上进行管理的说法正确吗?没有高质量的管理应用程序吗? [英] are claims of Oracle being hard to administer on simple tasks correct? aren't there quality admin apps for it?

问题描述

我在这里 http://discuss.joelonsoftware看到了这一说法. .com/default.asp?joel.3.456646.47 .以及可以使用"oracle sucks"在Google上查找的各种其他选项.好吧，好吧，如果说像Drupal这样低调的东西没有易于使用的可视化IDE，我可以理解为什么，但是，如果对于像Oracle这样的大笔钱来说确实如此，那么为什么我们看不到整个市场呢?在Oracle上进行基本DBA工作的用户友好的可视化工具生态系统?我的意思是，从事Oracle工作的人员为预算较大的公司工作，因此，他们一定可以负担得起花哨的坐着并享受Oracle管理工作室"的许可证，以帮助开发人员自己做一些事情而不会费心DBA?还是这些工具确实存在并能很好地完成工作，而做蚂蚁的人根本不知道它们?

I see this claim made in a rant here http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?joel.3.456646.47 . As well as in various other rants that can be looked up on google using "oracle sucks". Ok, well, if let's say something as low key as Drupal doesn't have an easy to use visual IDE I can understand why, but if this is really true about something as big money as Oracle, why don't we see an entire ecosystem of user-friendly visual tools for basic DBA work on Oracle? I mean, people who work on Oracle work for companies with big budgets, so surely they could afford a license for a fancy "sit tight and enjoy the ride Oracle admin studio" of some sort to help developers do some stuff by themselves without pestering the DBA? Or do these tools really exist and do good job whereas the people doing the rants are simply unaware of them?

推荐答案

如果要在大型公司环境中部署Oracle，那么将有一个用户友好工具生态系统来管理数据库.但是，这些工具大多数都相对较难安装-例如，它们需要自己的数据库，并将组件和中央存储库一起安装在数据库服务器上.当您在Oracle数据库许可证上花费6或7个数字并且需要处理诸如连续监视和警报之类的事情时，投资这种重量级的基础架构是非常有意义的.

If you're deploying Oracle in a large corporate environment, there is an ecosystem of user-friendly tools to administer the database. But most of those tools are relatively painful to install-- they need their own database, for example, and install components on the database server along with the central repository. It makes perfect sense to invest in this sort of heavy-weight infrastructure when you're spending 6 or 7 figures on Oracle database licenses and you need to handle things like continuous monitoring and alerting.

另一方面，大多数抱怨Oracle可用性的人们正在尝试在完全不同的环境中安装和运行Oracle.例如，如果您是一名开发人员，希望在本地便携式计算机上运行Oracle，以便安装完整堆栈，则不需要或不需要这些重量级的工具之一.这些人最终将使用Oracle默认安装的任何工具.传统上，这些工具不太理想. Oracle通过将带有轻量级企业管理器Web客户端的数据库附带的数据库进行了改进，该数据库对于此类安装非常有用.但是，要确保企业管理器Web客户端在开发人员的Windows笔记本电脑上完美运行仍会有些困难，这会导致大量开发人员得出甲骨文很烂"的结论.

On the other hand, most of the folks that are complaining about Oracle usability are trying to install and run Oracle in a much different environment. If you're a developer, for example, that wants to run Oracle on your local laptop so that you have the full stack installed, you're not going to need or want one of these heavyweight tools. Those folks are going to end up with whatever tools Oracle installs by default. Traditionally, those tools have been somewhat less than ideal. Oracle is getting better about that by shipping a lightweight Enterprise Manager web client with the database that is very useful for these types of installs. But it can still be a bit of a fight to ensure that the Enterprise Manager web client works perfectly on a developer's Windows laptop install which leads a non-trivial number of developers to conclude that "Oracle sucks".

这篇关于Oracle很难在简单任务上进行管理的说法正确吗?没有高质量的管理应用程序吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！