当前不存在哪些有用的R包? [英] What useful R package doesn't currently exist?

问题描述

我一直在为一些R尚不可用的常规工具开发一些R软件包:博客，报告交付，日志记录和计划.这使我想知道:人们希望在R中存在的最重要的事情是什么，目前尚不可用?

I have been working on a few R packages for some general tools that aren't currently available in R: blogging, report delivery, logging, and scheduling. This led me to wonder: what are the most important things that people wish existed in R that currently aren't available?

我希望我们可以利用它来找出一些差距，并可能进行合作.

My hope is that we can use this to pinpoint some gaps, and possibly work on them collaboratively.

推荐答案

我是前Mathematica迷，我真正想念的一件事是笔记本样式的界面.当我用笔记本进行研究时，论文几乎会像我进行分析时一样写自己.但是现在我正在使用R，我发现记录我的工作非常繁琐.

I'm a former Mathematica junkie, and one thing that I really miss is the notebook style interface. When I did my research with notebooks, papers would almost write themselves as I did my analysis. But now that I'm using R, I find that documenting my work to be quite tedious.

对于不太熟悉Mathematica的人们，您拥有称为笔记本"的文档，其中可以包含代码，文本，方程式以及已执行代码的结果(可以是方程式，文本，图形或交互式工具).一切都可以整齐地组织成样式可折叠的小节或小节.您可以有多个与单个共享内核集成的打开文档.

For people that are not so familiar with Mathematica, you have documents called "notebooks" that can contain code, text, equations, and the results from executed code (which can be equations, text, graphics, or interactive tools). Everything can be neatly organized into styled subsections or sections that are collapsable. You can have multiple open documents that integrate with a single shared kernel.

虽然我认为完全不需要完整的Mathematica风格的界面，但是一些支持文本(用于描述)，代码，代码输出和嵌入式图像输出的交互式文档系统对研究人员来说是真正的福音.

While I don't think a full-blown Mathematica style interface is entirely necessary, some interactive document system that would support text (for description), code, code output, and embedded image output would be a real boon to researchers.

这篇关于当前不存在哪些有用的R包?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！