分组分类并计算要素中的缺失值 [英] Groupby class and count missing values in features
问题描述
我遇到了问题,即使我认为这很琐碎,也无法在Web或文档中找到任何解决方案.
I have a problem and I cannot find any solution in the web or documentation, even if I think that it is very trivial.
我想做什么?
我有一个这样的数据框
CLASS FEATURE1 FEATURE2 FEATURE3
X A NaN NaN
X NaN A NaN
B A A A
我想按标签( CLASS )分组并显示每个功能中计数的NaN值的数量,以便看起来像这样.这样做的目的是为了大致了解缺失值如何分布在不同的类上.
I want to group by the label(CLASS) and display the number of NaN-Values that are counted in every feature so that it looks like this. The purpose of this is to get a general idea how missing values are distributed over the different classes.
CLASS FEATURE1 FEATURE2 FEATURE3
X 1 1 2
B 0 0 0
我知道如何接收 nonnull -Values-df.groupby['CLASS'].count()
I know how to recieve the amount of nonnull-Values - df.groupby['CLASS'].count()
NaN 值是否有相似之处?
Is there something similar for the NaN-Values?
我试图从size()中减去count(),但是它返回了一个未格式化的输出,其中填充了值NaN
I tried to subtract the count() from the size() but it returned an unformatted output filled with the value NaN
推荐答案
使用isna
计算遮罩,然后分组并找到总和:
Compute a mask with isna
, then group and find the sum:
df.drop('CLASS', 1).isna().groupby(df.CLASS, sort=False).sum().reset_index()
CLASS FEATURE1 FEATURE2 FEATURE3
0 X 1.0 1.0 2.0
1 B 0.0 0.0 0.0
另一种选择是使用rsub
沿着第0 轴从count
中减去size
,以进行索引对齐减法:
Another option is to subtract the size
from the count
using rsub
along the 0th axis for index aligned subtraction:
df.groupby('CLASS').count().rsub(df.groupby('CLASS').size(), axis=0)
或者,
g = df.groupby('CLASS')
g.count().rsub(g.size(), axis=0)
FEATURE1 FEATURE2 FEATURE3
CLASS
B 0 0 0
X 1 1 2
有很多不错的答案,所以下面是一些timeits
供您细读:
There are quite a few good answers, so here are some timeits
for your perusal:
df_ = df
df = pd.concat([df_] * 10000)
%timeit df.drop('CLASS', 1).isna().groupby(df.CLASS, sort=False).sum()
%timeit df.set_index('CLASS').isna().sum(level=0)
%%timeit
g = df.groupby('CLASS')
g.count().rsub(g.size(), axis=0)
11.8 ms ± 108 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
9.47 ms ± 379 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
6.54 ms ± 81.6 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
实际效果取决于您的数据和设置,因此里程可能会有所不同.
Actual performance depends on your data and setup, so your mileage may vary.
这篇关于分组分类并计算要素中的缺失值的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!