哪种cpan安装程序是正确的? (CPAN.pm/CPANPLUS/cpanminus) [英] Which cpan installer is the right one? (CPAN.pm/CPANPLUS/cpanminus)

问题描述

有多个用于cpan模块的安装程序；我至少知道CPAN.pm(perl附带)，CPANPLUS和cpanminus.

There are multiple installers for cpan modules available; I know of at least CPAN.pm (comes with perl,) CPANPLUS, and cpanminus.

三个之间有什么区别?

什么情况需要使用一种?

What situations call for using one over the other?

还有其他我应该知道的模块安装程序吗?

Are there other module installers I should know about?

推荐答案

CPAN.pm ( cpan)是原始客户端.它随Perl一起提供，因此您已经拥有了它.它具有最多的功能.尽管实际上每个人都接受默认安装，但它具有许多配置选项以自定义其工作方式.它可以轻松地与 local :: lib 集成.

CPAN.pm (cpan) is the original client. It comes with Perl, so you already have it. It has the most features. It has a lot of configuration options to customize the way it works, though virtually everyone accepts the default installation. It integrates easily with local::lib.

cpanminus (cpanm)尝试进行零配置自动为大多数用户执行正确操作的客户端.它还可以在资源有限的系统(例如 VPS )上很好地运行.它不随Perl一起提供，但易于安装.它可以与 local :: lib 轻松集成.

cpanminus (cpanm) is an attempt to make a zero-configuration client that automatically does the right thing for most users. It's also designed to run well on systems with limited resources (e.g. a VPS). It doesn't come with Perl, but it's easy to install. It integrates easily with local::lib.

它的最大局限性是缺乏配置.如果您想做一些不寻常的事情，它可能不支持.

Its biggest limitation is its lack of configuration. If you want to do something unusual, it may not support it.

CPANPLUS (cpanp)是一种尝试使Perl程序可以使用的CPAN API使用，而不是您在命令行中使用的应用. cpanp shell更像是一种概念证明，我不知道使用它的任何真正优势.

CPANPLUS (cpanp) is an attempt to make a CPAN API that Perl programs can use, instead of an app that you use from the command line. The cpanp shell is more of a proof-of-concept, and I don't know of any real advantages to using it.

总之，我建议cpan或cpanm.如果在配置cpan时遇到问题，请尝试cpanm.如果情况不正常，请尝试cpan.

In summary, I'd recommend either cpan or cpanm. If you have trouble configuring cpan, try cpanm. If your situation is unusual, try cpan.

这篇关于哪种cpan安装程序是正确的? (CPAN.pm/CPANPLUS/cpanminus)的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！