array_unique与array_flip [英] array_unique vs array_flip

问题描述

如果我有一个有符号整数数组，例如:

Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 3
    [4] => 3
)

要获得唯一值，我会本能地使用array_unique，但经过考虑，我可以执行两次array_flip，效果相同，而且我认为这样会更快?

array_unique O(n log n)，因为它使用了排序操作

array_flip O(n)

我的假设是否正确?

更新/示例:

$intArray1 = array(-4,1,2,3);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);

Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 3
    [4] => 3
)
Array
(
    [-3] => 0
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 4
)
Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [4] => 3
)

解决方案

我为您进行了基准测试: CodePad

您对此的直觉是正确的！

$test=array();
for($run=0; $run<1000; $run++)
$test[]=rand(0,100);

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_unique($test);

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Array Unique: '.$time."\n";

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_keys(array_flip($test));

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Keys Flip: '.$time."\n";

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_flip(array_flip($test));

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Flip Flip: '.$time."\n";

输出:

Array Unique: 1.1829199790955
Keys Flip: 0.0084578990936279
Flip Flip: 0.0083951950073242

请注意，array_keys(array_flip($array))将按顺序给出新的键值，这在许多情况下可能是您想要的(相同的，除了要快到array_values(array_unique($array))以外)，而array_flip(array_flip($array))是相同的(除了要快得多)到array_unique($array)按键保持不变.

If I had an array of signed integers e.g:

Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 3
    [4] => 3
)

To get unique values I would instinctively use array_unique but after consideration I could perform array_flip twice which would have the same effect, and I think it would be quicker?

array_unique O(n log n) because of the sort operation it uses

array_flip O(n)

Am I correct in my assumptions?

UPDATE / EXAMPLE:

$intArray1 = array(-4,1,2,3);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);

Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 3
    [4] => 3
)
Array
(
    [-3] => 0
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [3] => 4
)
Array
(
    [0] => -3
    [1] => 1
    [2] => 2
    [4] => 3
)

解决方案

I benchmarked it for you: CodePad

Your intuition on this was correct!

$test=array();
for($run=0; $run<1000; $run++)
$test[]=rand(0,100);

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_unique($test);

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Array Unique: '.$time."\n";

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_keys(array_flip($test));

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Keys Flip: '.$time."\n";

$time=microtime(true);

for($run=0; $run<100; $run++)
$out=array_flip(array_flip($test));

$time=microtime(true)-$time;
echo 'Flip Flip: '.$time."\n";

Output:

Array Unique: 1.1829199790955
Keys Flip: 0.0084578990936279
Flip Flip: 0.0083951950073242

Note that array_keys(array_flip($array)) will give a new key values in order, which in many cases may be what you want (identical except much faster to array_values(array_unique($array))), whereas array_flip(array_flip($array)) is identical (except much faster) to array_unique($array) where the keys remain the same.

这篇关于array_unique与array_flip的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！