PhpStorm是否可以推断此方法的返回类型? [英] Is it possible for PhpStorm to infer the return type of this method?

问题描述

我想我可能需要在某个地方添加一个特殊的注释，但是我不由自主地意识到，PhpStorm足够聪明，可以解决给定笨拙的继承模式的返回类型.

I imagine I might need to add a special annotation somewhere, but I'm crossing my fingers that PhpStorm is smart enough to resolve return types given awkward inheritance patterns.

例如，我有一些类似于此的代码:

For example, I have some code that resembles this:

<?php

class Collection extends \ArrayObject
{
    public function __construct(array $items)
    {
        foreach ($items as $key => $value) {
            if (isset(static::$requiredType) && !$item instanceof static::$requiredType)
                $this->offsetSet($key, $value);
        }
    }

    public function getFirst()
    {
        return $this->offsetGet(0);
    }
}

class MessageCollection extends Collection
{
    protected static $requiredType = 'Message';
}

class UserCollection extends Collection
{
    protected static $requiredType = 'User';
}

如果我调用UserCollection::getFirst()时它推断返回了User，而我调用MessageCollection::getFirst()时它推断返回了Message，则我想这样做.我可以在某处添加一些注释以实现此结果吗?

I'd like it if when I call UserCollection::getFirst() it inferred that a User was returned, while when I call MessageCollection::getFirst() it inferred that a Message was returned. Is there some annotation I could put in somewhere to achieve this result?

我的第一个想法是这样的:

My first thought was something like this:

    /**
     * @return Message|User|XXXX|YYYY|ZZZZ|AAAA|BBBB|CCCC|DDDD
     */
    public function getFirst()
    {
        return $this->offsetGet(0);
    }

但是我想当我添加更多的收集类时，这会变得毫无用处.

but I imagine that would get a little ridiculous to the point of being useless as I add more collection classes.

推荐答案

尝试一下:

/**
 * @method \User getFirst()
 */
class UserCollection extends Collection
{
    protected static $requiredType = 'User';
}

这篇关于PhpStorm是否可以推断此方法的返回类型?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！