使用powermock和Jersey Test + TestNg测试Jersey休息服务时的问题 [英] Issue when test a Jersey rest service using powermock with Jersey Test + TestNg

查看:117
本文介绍了使用powermock和Jersey Test + TestNg测试Jersey休息服务时的问题的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

开发了使用Jersey的休息服务。现在,我想为此Web服务编写一些集成测试,但是由于不是已经实现了Web服务中使用的每个类,因此我需要模拟其中的一些。例如,我有以下类:

A rest service using Jersey developed. Now I want to write some integration tests for this web service but since not every class being used from the web service is already implemented I need to mock some of them. For example I have the following class:

public class ServiceA {

public String getService() {
    return null;
}}

@Path("/myresource")
public class ResourceController {

@GET 
@Produces("text/plain")
public String getIt() {
    ServiceA a = new ServiceA();
    return a.getService();
}}

然后我要测试使用Jersey测试框架和TestNg进行集成测试Powerpock(使用构造函数模拟新对象)。

Then i want to test do integration test with Jersey test framework and TestNg + Powermock (mock new object with constructor).

import org.glassfish.jersey.server.ResourceConfig;
import org.glassfish.jersey.test.JerseyTestNg;
import org.glassfish.jersey.test.jdkhttp.JdkHttpServerTestContainerFactory;
import org.glassfish.jersey.test.spi.TestContainerFactory;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PowerMockIgnore;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.testng.PowerMockObjectFactory;
import org.testng.Assert;
import org.testng.IObjectFactory;
import org.testng.annotations.ObjectFactory;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;

import javax.ws.rs.core.Application;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Response;

import static org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.mock;

    @PowerMockIgnore({"javax.ws.*", "org.glassfish.*"})
    @PrepareForTest({ResourceController.class})
        public class ResourceControllerTest extends JerseyTestNg.ContainerPerMethodTest {
       @Override
        protected Application configure() {
            return new ResourceConfig(ResourceController.class);
        }

        @Override
        protected TestContainerFactory getTestContainerFactory() {
            return new JdkHttpServerTestContainerFactory();
        }

@ObjectFactory
public IObjectFactory getObjectFactory() {
    return new PowerMockObjectFactory();
}


        @Test
        public void getItTest() {
            ServiceA mockA = mock(ServiceA.class);
            Mockito.when(mockA.getService()).thenReturn("service a");
  PowerMockito.whenNew(ServiceA.class).withAnyArguments().thenReturn(mockA);
            Response result = target("myresource").request().get();
            Assert.assertEquals(result.readEntity(String.class), "service a");
        }
    }

我的pom依赖:

    <dependency>
            <groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.test-framework.providers</groupId>
            <artifactId>jersey-test-framework-provider-inmemory</artifactId>
            <version>2.21</version>
        </dependency> 

        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.test-framework</groupId>
            <artifactId>jersey-test-framework-core</artifactId>
            <version>2.21</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
            <artifactId>powermock-module-testng</artifactId>
            <version>1.7.0</version>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>
<dependency>
            <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
            <artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
            <version>1.7.0</version>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>

但是在运行时,getIt()方法中的实例ServiceA仍被初始化为新的ServiceA对象,而不是模拟对象。

But in runtime, the instance ServiceA in getIt() method is still initalized as new ServiceA object not the mockA object.

对此有任何想法吗?谢谢,

Any idea about it? Thanks,

如果添加PowerMockIgnore({ javax.ws。, org.glassfish。}),则请参见以下异常:

if add PowerMockIgnore({"javax.ws.", "org.glassfish."}), then see below exception:

java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
    at org.mockito.internal.exceptions.stacktrace.ConditionalStackTraceFilter.<init>(ConditionalStackTraceFilter.java:17)
    at org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException.filterStackTrace(MockitoException.java:41)
    at org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException.<init>(MockitoException.java:30)
    at org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.MockitoConfigurationException.<init>(MockitoConfigurationException.java:18)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.PluginLoader.loadImpl(PluginLoader.java:66)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.PluginLoader.loadPlugin(PluginLoader.java:24)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.PluginRegistry.<init>(PluginRegistry.java:12)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.Plugins.<clinit>(Plugins.java:11)
    at org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil.<clinit>(MockUtil.java:24)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.injection.scanner.MockScanner.<init>(MockScanner.java:22)
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.InjectingAnnotationEngine.injectMocks(InjectingAnnotationEngine.java:96)
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.configuration.PowerMockitoInjectingAnnotationEngine.process(PowerMockitoInjectingAnnotationEngine.java:35)
    at org.powermock.api.extension.listener.AnnotationEnabler.injectSpiesAndInjectToSetters(AnnotationEnabler.java:72)
    at org.powermock.api.extension.listener.AnnotationEnabler.beforeTestMethod(AnnotationEnabler.java:64)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.performMethodInvocation(WhiteboxImpl.java:1846)
    at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.invokeMethod(WhiteboxImpl.java:700)
    at org.powermock.reflect.Whitebox.invokeMethod(Whitebox.java:415)
    at org.powermock.modules.testng.internal.PowerMockTestNGMethodHandler.injectMocksUsingAnnotationEnabler(PowerMockTestNGMethodHandler.java:76)
    at org.powermock.modules.testng.internal.PowerMockTestNGMethodHandler.invoke(PowerMockTestNGMethodHandler.java:48)
    at com.hp.ucmdb.rest.ResourceControllerTest_$$_jvstb11_0.setUp(ResourceControllerTest_$$_jvstb11_0.java)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:86)
    at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurationMethod(Invoker.java:514)
    at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurations(Invoker.java:215)
    at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:589)
    at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:820)
    at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1128)
    at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:129)
    at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:112)
    at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:782)
    at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:632)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:366)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:361)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:319)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:268)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:52)
    at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:86)
    at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1244)
    at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1169)
    at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1064)
    at org.testng.IDEARemoteTestNG.run(IDEARemoteTestNG.java:72)
    at org.testng.RemoteTestNGStarter.main(RemoteTestNGStarter.java:127)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at org.mockito.internal.configuration.plugins.Plugins.getStackTraceCleanerProvider(Plugins.java:17)
    at org.mockito.internal.exceptions.stacktrace.StackTraceFilter.<clinit>(StackTraceFilter.java:21)
    ... 49 more


推荐答案

我相信模拟可能不会发生,因为您没有Po

I believe the mock is perhaps not happening because you dont have the PowerMock's objectfactory implementation wired into TestNG.

为了使powermockito和TestNG相互配合,您必须执行以下操作:

In order to get powermockito and TestNG to work with each other you have to do the following :


  • 配置TestNG以使用PowerMock对象工厂:您可以通过 object-factory 中的属性来执行此操作套件xml的c $ c>< suite> 标记,或通过 @ org.testng.annotations.ObjectFactory 带注释的方法返回Powermock的TestNG接口 org.testng.IObjectFactory 的实现,即 org.powermock.modules.testng.PowerMockObjectFactory (或)通过扩展 org.powermock.modules.testng.PowerMockTestCase

  • 使用@PrepareForTest来准备要由PowerMockit模拟的静态类

  • Configure TestNG to use the PowerMock object factory : You can do this either via the attribute object-factory in your <suite> tag of your suite xml or via an @org.testng.annotations.ObjectFactory annotated method which returns the powermock's implementation of TestNG interface org.testng.IObjectFactory viz., org.powermock.modules.testng.PowerMockObjectFactory (or) by extending org.powermock.modules.testng.PowerMockTestCase
  • Use @PrepareForTest to prepare your static class for being mocked by PowerMockit

我在代码中使用PowerMock的Object工厂接线找不到对您的引用。您可以尝试这样做,看看是否有帮助吗?

I couldnt find any reference to you using the PowerMock's Object factory wiring in, in your code. Can you please try doing that and see if that helps ?

请在此处中查看有关完整的详细信息。

Please see here for full details.

更新:
为了摆脱ClassCastExceptions,您需要添加以下内容

Update: In order to get past the ClassCastExceptions you would need to add the below annotation to your class.

@org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PowerMockIgnore({"javax.ws.*", "org.glassfish.*"})

有关此操作的更多详细信息,请参阅这个stackoverflow 问题

For more details around this, please refer to this stackoverflow question

PS:我假设您正在使用以下注释使powermock为模拟准备测试类(您的问题示例中显示了其他内容)

PS : I am assuming that you are using the following annotation to have powermock prepare your test class for mocking (Your sample in your question is showing something else)

@org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest({ResourceController.class})

这篇关于使用powermock和Jersey Test + TestNg测试Jersey休息服务时的问题的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆