代码合同-重写器因缺少参考而失败 [英] Code contracts - Rewriter fails with missing reference

问题描述

我正在尝试对我拥有的某些库使用代码协定。我的库A引用了ThirdParty库B。库C引用了A，并且从不使用B，也没有使用使用B的A的位。重写器虽然尝试查找库B失败，但A的引用程序集存在，我希望重写者对此感到满意。

I'm trying to use code contracts for some libraries I have. My library A has a reference to ThirdParty library B. Library C references A, and never uses B nor does it use the bits of A that use B. The rewriter fails though trying to find library B. The reference assembly for A exists, I was hoping that the rewriter would be just happy with that.

任何关于如何构建它的想法，都没有将依赖B的A中的位移到其自己的程序集中？

Any ideas on how I can build this, short of moving the bits in A that rely on B out into its own assembly?

编辑：要回答一个问题，是的，A中有一些公共类型，它们公开了B中的类型。我希望那些分析将在库A处结束，并且希望它将B视为存在完全没有参考程序集（即忽略它）。

To answer a question, yes, there are public types in A which expose types in B. I was hoping those the analysis would end at the library A, and that it would treat B as if there was no reference assembly at all (ie, ignore it).

推荐答案

似乎没有办法解决。在某些方面，我认为它很好，因为它可以帮助您查看第三方依赖项在哪里泄漏。

It seems that there is no way around this. In some regards I think its good as it helps you see where your third party dependencies are leaking.

这篇关于代码合同-重写器因缺少参考而失败的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！