内部班的公开和内部成员? [英] Public and Internal members in an Internal class?

查看:89
本文介绍了内部班的公开和内部成员?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

好的,所以这可能是一个愚蠢的问题,肯定有一个明显的答案,但是我很好奇我是否错过了这里的任何细微之处。

Ok, so this may be a bit of a silly question, and there's certainly the obvious answer, but I was curious if I've missed any subtleties here.

内部类中声明的公共成员与<$$之间在可见性/可用性方面是否存在差异c $ c>内部成员在内部类中声明?

Is there any difference in terms of visibility/usability between a public member declared in an internal class and an internal member declared in an internal class?

ie

internal class Foo
{
    public void Bar()
    {
    }
}

internal class Foo
{
    internal void Bar()
    {
    }
}

如果您将该方法声明为 public 以及虚拟,然后在公共的派生类中覆盖它,使用此修饰符的原因很明显。但是,这是唯一的情况吗……我还缺少其他东西吗?

If you declared the method as public and also virtual, and then overrode it in a derived class that is public, the reason for using this modifier is clear. However, is this the only situation... am I missing something else?

推荐答案

考虑这种情况:

public interface IBar { void Bar(); }
internal class C : IBar
{
    public void Bar() { }
}

此处C.Bar不能标记为内部;这样做是一个错误,因为D.GetBar()的调用者可以访问C.Bar:

Here C.Bar cannot be marked as internal; doing so is an error because C.Bar can be accessed by a caller of D.GetBar():

public class D
{
    public static IBar GetBar() { return new C(); } 
}

这篇关于内部班的公开和内部成员?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆