如何使用Fluent Assertion比较两个随属性而变化的集合? [英] How to compare two collections that vary by properties using Fluent Assertion?

问题描述

我有从内部类Rule创建的公共类RuleInfo.

I have public class RuleInfo which is created from internal class Rule.

private static RuleInfo CreateRuleInfo(Rule r)
{
    return new RuleInfo
    {
        RuleCode = r.RuleId,
        DisplayName = r.RuleCode,
        Description = r.Description,
        LegacyRuleCode = null
    };
}

它们的属性名称不同，因此ShouldBeEquivalentTo()或ShouldAllBeEquivalentTo()不起作用.

They vary in their properties names so ShouldBeEquivalentTo() or ShouldAllBeEquivalentTo() don't work.

现在，我正在手动/明确地比较它们:

Right now I'm comparing them manually/explicitly:

foreach (var x in Enumerable.Zip(infs, rules, (i, r) => new { Info = i, Rule = r }))
{
    x.Info.ShouldBeEquivalentTo(
        new
        {
            RuleCode = x.Rule.RuleId,
            DisplayName = x.Rule.RuleCode,
            Description = x.Rule.Description,
            LegacyRuleCode = (string)null
        });
}

是否有更好，更紧凑，更不明确，更易读的方式?

Is there a better, more compact, less explicit, more readable way?

推荐答案

不幸的是，当比较不同类型时，目前尚无法指定属性之间的映射.关于它，有一个公开的问题.

Unfortunately there currently isn't a way to specify a mapping between properties when comparing different types. There is an open issue about it.

这是比较两个集合的另一种示例. 请注意，我假设==执行值相等. 因此，如果您的所有财产都是int和string，那么您就可以安全使用.

Here's an example on another way to compare two collections. Be aware that I'm assuming that == performs value equality. So if all your properties are int and string you are home safe.

ruleInfos.Should().Equal(rules, (ruleInfo, rule) =>
    ruleInfo.RuleCode == rule.RuleId
     && ruleInfo.DisplayName == rule.RuleCode
    && ruleInfo.Description == rule.Description
);

例如没有超载==的引用类型，您将需要使用例如

For e.g. a reference type with no overload of == you would need to handle null values gracefully with e.g.

(PropertyA == PropertyB) || (PropertyA?.Equals(PropertyB) == true

这篇关于如何使用Fluent Assertion比较两个随属性而变化的集合?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！