与Webrick相比，使用Passenger + Apache的优势 [英] Advantages of using Passenger + Apache over Webrick

问题描述

我想说服管理层，使用Apache +乘客设置是进行生产的一种方式，而不是使用webrick或mongrel

I want to convince my management that using Apache + passenger setup is way to go on production rather than having webrick or mongrel

我从网上发现了一些要点.

I have found some points from the net.

如果您能提出自己的想法，那将是非常有帮助的，因为它将反过来帮助我提出我的观点. (欢迎提供技术细节)

It would be great help if you could add your thoughts as that will defiantly help me to present my points. (technical details are welcome)

如果有的话您可以发送一些链接，那将是很好的

and It will great if you could send some links if you have any

预先感谢

欢呼

萨摩耶拉

推荐答案

，您可以看到比较并做出选择

you can see the comparison and make your choice

Overall conclusion
Participant                                      Speed (r/sec)  Memory usage (MB)
Apache (prefork MPM) + Phusion Passenger         444.88         240.0
Apache (worker MPM) + Phusion Passenger          452.10         238.5
Nginx + Mongrel Cluster                          354.80         227.0
Nginx + Thin                                     458.0          228.0
LiteSpeed                                        470.03         334.0
Apache (worker MPM) + Ruby Enterprise
Edition + Phusion Passenger                      564.30         163.5

这篇关于与Webrick相比，使用Passenger + Apache的优势的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！