序列化或放大 [英] Serialize or Implode

查看:83
本文介绍了序列化或放大的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我需要在数据库中存储很多二维数组,并且不确定要使用什么:serializeimplode.因此,我进行了一些测试,以找出哪个工作更快,并得出结论是serialize:

I need to store lots of two-dimensional arrays inside database and was not sure what to use: serialize or implode. So I did a few tests, to find out which one is working faster and came to the conclusion it was serialize:

Execution times: 1'000'000
Serialize: 1.4974119663239 seconds
Implode: 2.5333571434021 seconds
Explode: 4.0185871124268 seconds
Unserialize: 1.6835169792175 seconds 

所以问题是:为什么 implode + explode serialize + unserialize 慢得多?

So the question: Why is implode+explode so much slower then serialize+unserialize?

PS:我已经发现了这个问题,但这并不是我要问的./p>

PS: I found this question already, but it is not exactly what I am asking.

推荐答案

我的想法是explode/implode对字符串进行操作,这就是为什么,而serialize/unserialize则在此位置输出/输入字符串结束/开始. implode中的字符串越多,explode中的字符串越长,它越慢,您是否尝试过?

My idea is that explode/implode operate on strings that's why, while serialize/unserialize output/input a string at the very ending/beginning. Probably the more strings you implode and the longer string you explode, the slower it is, have you tried?

使用哪个我不知道,这取决于您以后是否要处理输出字符串,我认为serialize d字符串更难解析.但是要将其存储在数据库或文件中,我将使用serialize.

Which to use I don't know, it depends if you later wish to handle output string, I think serialized string is more difficult to parse. But to store it in database or file I'd use serialize.

这篇关于序列化或放大的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆