Spring在方法上的@Profile是一个好习惯吗 [英] Is Spring's @Profile on methods a good practice

问题描述

我有一个Spring Boot Web应用程序，公开了休息服务.

I have a Spring Boot Web application exposing rest services.

我在问自己如何正确管理过滤器"上的配置文件. 实际上，我的应用程序有2个配置文件:dev和prod(您猜它代表什么...)

I'm asking myself how to correctly manage profiles on Filters. Actually, my app has 2 profiles: dev and prod (you guess what it stands for...)

在生产模式下，我要激活的过滤器比在开发模式下要多.

In prod mode, i have more filters to activate than in dev mode.

我的过滤器"配置类如下:

My Filters configuration class is the following:

@Configuration
public class FiltersConfig {

    @Bean
    public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistrationBean(CompositeFilter compositeFilter){
        FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistrationBean = new FilterRegistrationBean();
        filterRegistrationBean.setDispatcherTypes(EnumSet.allOf(DispatcherType.class));
        filterRegistrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/*");
        filterRegistrationBean.setFilter(compositeFilter);
        return filterRegistrationBean;
    }

    @Bean
    @Profile("dev")
    public CompositeFilter devCompositeFilter(){
        CompositeFilter compositeFilter = new CompositeFilter();
        List<Filter> filtersList = new ArrayList<>();
        //filtersList.add(filter1());
        compositeFilter.setFilters(filtersList);
        return compositeFilter;
    }


    @Bean
    @Profile("prod")
    public CompositeFilter prodCompositeFilter(){
        CompositeFilter compositeFilter = new CompositeFilter();
        List<Filter> filtersList = new ArrayList<>();
        //filtersList.add(filter1());
        compositeFilter.setFilters(filtersList);
        return compositeFilter;
    }
}

我的问题是:

• 在方法上添加@Profile是一种好习惯吗?
• 是否有一种方法可以强制编译器排除类，方法等，这些类，方法等使用与当前配置文件不同的配置文件进行注释? (我不希望我的生产jar/war充满不必要的代码！)
• 弹簧靴是否提供了一种更清晰的方式来组织档案?

• Is it a good practice to add @Profile on method?
• Is there a way to force the compiler to exclude classes, methods, etc. annotated with a diferent profiles than the one set as current? (I don't want my production jar/war populated with unnecessary code!)
• Does spring boot provide a clearer way to organize profiles?

thx.

推荐答案

我认为最好在不同的程序包中为不同环境配置.您不想混合您的配置. 结构可能看起来像这样:

I think it would be better to have configurations for different environments in distinct packages. You don't want to mix your configuration. The structure might look like this:

config
    - Config1.java
    - Config2.java
    dev
        - WebConfig.java
        - DataConfig.java
    prod
        - WebConfig.java
        - DataConfig.java

这篇关于Spring在方法上的@Profile是一个好习惯吗的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！