内部类构造器...起作用吗? [英] Internal Class Constructer... does this work?

问题描述

对不起，伙计们，我知道你们会告诉我我需要进行搜索，但是我已经肯定了，我确信我认为这可以按我想要的方式工作是正确的，但是我想我会在这里提出问题，并尝试从我的学习经历中获得一些专业的帮助，因为统一答案并不是那么好.

Ok sorry guys, I know you guys are gonna tell me I need to search and search, but I have already and I am pretty sure I am correct in assuming this will work the way I want it to, but I figured I would ask here and try to get some professional help on my learning experience since unity answers isn't so great.

无论如何，我都试图开始构建另一个MMORPG，同时我也在学习c Sharp.我有一个职业类(玩家的职业，例如法师，骑士等)，我想在创建玩家职业的同时创建它，因此我需要使用一个ID来确定哪个职业以及什么职业他们继承的属性值.

Anyways I am trying to start constructing another MMORPG and I am also learning c sharp at the same time. I have a class for Vocation (the job of the player, like mage, knight, ect) that I want to be created during the same time my player class is created, and so I need to use an id to decide which vocation and what property values they inherit.

这就是我所拥有的，在我努力做到这一点时会起作用吗?还是我做错了什么严重的事情??

This is what I have, will this work as I am trying to make it? Or am I doing something horribly wrong...?

编辑

using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;

//DONE: abstract: a personage can't be "Vocation", but Mage, Warrior, Archer... 
public abstract class Vocation
{
    //DONE: just a readonly property 
    public int Vid {get; }
    //DONE: just a readonly property
    public string Name { get { return _Name; } }
    protected string _Name = "None";

    //DONE: let's ensure the property to be overriden
    public abstract HitPointsPerLevel { get; }
    public abstract ManaPointsPerLevel { get; }

    //DONE: you don't want this constructor to be public, but protected only   
    //DONE: Assign all the data in one place
    protected Vocation(int vid)
    {
        Vid = vid;
    }
}

//DONE: do not declare derived class as inner one 
internal class Mage : Vocation
{
    sealed public override float HitPointsPerLevel { get { return 12f; } }
    sealed public override string _Name = "Mage";

    //DONE: typo constructor should have been "Mage"
    public Mage() : base(1)
    {
    }
}

现在如何看待人?

HOW DOES IT LOOK NOW GUYS?

推荐答案

我建议重新设计实现

using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;

//DONE: abstract: a personage can't be "Vocation", but Mage, Warrior, Archer... 
public abstract class Vocation
{
    //DONE: just a readonly property 
    public int Vid {get; }
    //DONE: just a readonly property
    public string Name {get; }

    //DONE: let's ensure the property to be overriden
    public abstract HitPointsPerLevel { get; }

    //DONE: you don't want this constructor to be public, but protected only   
    //DONE: Assign all the data in one place
    protected Vocation(int vid, string name)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(name))
            throw new ArgumentNullException("name");

        Vid = vid;
        Name = name;
    }
}

//DONE: do not declare derived class as inner one 
internal class Mage : Vocation
{
    sealed public override float HitPointsPerLevel { get { return 12f; } }

    //DONE: typo constructor should have been "Mage"
    public Mage() : base(1, "Mage")
    {
    }
}

这篇关于内部类构造器...起作用吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！