小于等于运算符:使用NaN [英] The Less-than-or-equal Operator: With NaN
问题描述
当我们使用小于或等于运算符时,这可以在抽象关系比较算法的支持下进行. 例如.
When we use The Less-than-or-equal Operator this is work under the hood with The Abstract Relational Comparison Algorithm. For example.
a <= b;
像这样转换为JavaScript
Convert to JavaScript like this
!(b < a)
EcmaScript Spesification说( http://www .ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-11.8.5 ),这表明至少一个操作数比返回的undefined少NaN 这就是
And EcmaScript Spesification says (http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-11.8.5) which indicates that at least one operand is NaN less than return undefined And this is meaning
var a = 1;
var b = "asd"
a < b // b.toNumber() => NaN and this is operation return undefined (false)
如果我们这样使用
var a = 1;
var b = "asd"
a <= b // this convert to !(b < a) and (b<a) return undefined
// and !(undefined) must be true
但是EcmaScript spesification表示这返回false.这对我来说很有趣,这是什么原因?
But EcmaScript spesification says this is return false. This is interesting for me what is reason this?
推荐答案
虽然< =确实使用了抽象关系比较算法,但a <= b
并不等同于!(b < a)
.它等效于b < a !== false ? false : true
(其中<
代表抽象关系比较算法,而不是JavaScript <
运算符,该运算符永远不能求和为undefined
),当b < a
为真时,其行为与!(b < a)
相同或完全false
,但是当b < a
通常为false时,行为就不会相同.如果b < a
计算为undefined
,则整个表达式将计算为false
.
While <= does use the Abstract Relational Comparison Algorithm, a <= b
isn't equivalent to !(b < a)
. It is equivalent to b < a !== false ? false : true
(where <
represents the Abstract Relational Comparison Algorithm, not the JavaScript <
operator which can never evaluate to undefined
), which behaves the same as !(b < a)
when b < a
is truthy or exactly false
, but does not behave the same when b < a
is falsey in general. If b < a
evaluates to undefined
, the whole expression will evaluate to false
.
这是在步骤6的规范中定义的,此处: https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-11.8.3
This is defined in the spec at step 6 here: https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-11.8.3
- 让 r 是执行抽象关系比较的结果 rval < lval ,其中 LeftFirst 等于 false .
- 如果 r 为 true 或未定义,则返回 false .否则,返回 true .
- Let r be the result of performing abstract relational comparison rval < lval with LeftFirst equal to false.
- If r is true or undefined, return false. Otherwise, return true.
抽象关系比较算法只能计算为true
,false
或undefined
;因此第6步中的否则"仅在r
为false
时适用,从而使a <= b
等效于b < a !== false ? false : true
(同样,其中<
代表抽象关系比较算法).
The Abstract Relational Comparison Algorithm can only evaluate to true
, false
, or undefined
; so the "Otherwise" in step 6 can only apply when r
is false
, making a <= b
equivalent to b < a !== false ? false : true
(again, where <
represents the Abstract Relational Comparison Algorithm).
这篇关于小于等于运算符:使用NaN的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!