不同类型的托管WCF应用程序及其优势 [英] Different Types of Hosting WCF application and there advantages

问题描述

可以完成不同类型的托管.

There are different types of Hosting can be done.

1. windows处理激活服务(WAS)

1. windows process activation services (WAS)

IIS

自动托管

在Windows服务中托管

Hosting in a Windows service

使用一个相对于另一个有优势吗?哪一个更可取?

is there advantage of using one over another? which one is preferable?

推荐答案

此和此可以提供帮助.但基本上:

This and this can help. But basically:

1)IIS现在使用WAS

1) IIS now using WAS

2)IIS托管.优点:通常不需要托管代码，易于维护，IIS基础结构(安全性，会话，站点集成等).缺点:被动"服务，需要IIS.

2) IIS hosting. Pros: generally no hosting code required, easy to maintain, IIS infrastructure (security, sessions, site integration etc). Cons: 'passive' services, require IIS.

3)自托管.优点:调试方便.缺点:没有基础设施，要求.自定义托管代码，交互式用法(通常来说).

3) Self hosting. Pros: easy debugging. Cons: no infrastructure, req. custom hosting code, interactive usage (generally speaking).

4)托管Windows服务.优点:对于活动"，长期运行的服务，服务基础结构(启动/停止/暂停，无人值守(非交互式)执行，依赖项，MMC等)，相对易于管理.缺点:要求.自定义托管代码，相对较难调试(相对于IIS托管).

4) Hosting in a Windows service. Pros: for 'active', long running services, services infrastructure (start/stop/pause, unattended (non interactive) execution, dependencies, mmc etc), relatively easy to manage. Cons: req. custom hosting code, relatively hard to debug (vs IIS hosting).

这篇关于不同类型的托管WCF应用程序及其优势的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！