Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗? [英] Scala - can 'for-yield' clause yields nothing for some condition?

查看:78
本文介绍了Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在Scala语言中,我想编写一个在给定范围内产生奇数的函数.该函数在迭代偶数时会打印一些日志.该函数的第一个版本是:

In Scala language, I want to write a function that yields odd numbers within a given range. The function prints some log when iterating even numbers. The first version of the function is:

def getOdds(N: Int): Traversable[Int] = {
  val list = new mutable.MutableList[Int]
  for (n <- 0 until N) {
    if (n % 2 == 1) {
      list += n
    } else {
      println("skip even number " + n)
    }
  }
  return list
}

如果我省略打印日志,则实现变得非常简单:

If I omit printing logs, the implementation become very simple:

def getOddsWithoutPrint(N: Int) =
  for (n <- 0 until N if (n % 2 == 1)) yield n

但是,我不想错过记录部分.如何更紧凑地重写第一个版本?如果可以像这样重写它,那就太好了

However, I don't want to miss the logging part. How do I rewrite the first version more compactly? It would be great if it can be rewritten similar to this:

def IWantToDoSomethingSimilar(N: Int) =
  for (n <- 0 until N) if (n % 2 == 1) yield n else println("skip even number " + n)

推荐答案

def IWantToDoSomethingSimilar(N: Int) = 
  for {
    n <- 0 until N
    if n % 2 != 0 || { println("skip even number " + n); false }
  } yield n

使用filter代替for表达式会更简单.

Using filter instead of a for expression would be slightly simpler though.

这篇关于Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆