Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗? [英] Scala - can 'for-yield' clause yields nothing for some condition?
本文介绍了Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
在Scala语言中,我想编写一个在给定范围内产生奇数的函数.该函数在迭代偶数时会打印一些日志.该函数的第一个版本是:
In Scala language, I want to write a function that yields odd numbers within a given range. The function prints some log when iterating even numbers. The first version of the function is:
def getOdds(N: Int): Traversable[Int] = {
val list = new mutable.MutableList[Int]
for (n <- 0 until N) {
if (n % 2 == 1) {
list += n
} else {
println("skip even number " + n)
}
}
return list
}
如果我省略打印日志,则实现变得非常简单:
If I omit printing logs, the implementation become very simple:
def getOddsWithoutPrint(N: Int) =
for (n <- 0 until N if (n % 2 == 1)) yield n
但是,我不想错过记录部分.如何更紧凑地重写第一个版本?如果可以像这样重写它,那就太好了
However, I don't want to miss the logging part. How do I rewrite the first version more compactly? It would be great if it can be rewritten similar to this:
def IWantToDoSomethingSimilar(N: Int) =
for (n <- 0 until N) if (n % 2 == 1) yield n else println("skip even number " + n)
推荐答案
def IWantToDoSomethingSimilar(N: Int) =
for {
n <- 0 until N
if n % 2 != 0 || { println("skip even number " + n); false }
} yield n
使用filter
代替for
表达式会更简单.
Using filter
instead of a for
expression would be slightly simpler though.
这篇关于Scala-'for-yield'子句在某些情况下不会产生任何收益吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文