该算法最坏的运行时间(如何证明)? [英] Worst case running time of this algorithm (how to justify)?
问题描述
我有一个正在尝试实现的算法.我被要求确定一个描述其最坏情况下运行时间的函数.作为输入,它需要一定长度的数组(我们称其为n).然后它的工作如下:
I have an algorithm i'm trying to implement. I've been asked to determine a function that describes its worst case running time. As input, it takes an array of some length (lets call it n). Then what it does is as follows:
if (n==0){ return 0;}
else if(n==1){return A[0];}
else{
return f(n-1)+f(n-2)
}
对不起,如果我对实现细节不太了解,但是在某种意义上,它与诸如fibbanoci序列之类的东西相当相似.我认为该算法的最坏情况运行时间是t(n)= 2 ^ n,因为如果n大,它将分解为2个单独的计算,进而又分解为2个,依此类推.我只是不确定如何正式证明这一点
Sorry if I'm a tad sparse on the implementation details, but in a sense, its rather similar to something like the fibbanoci sequence. I'm thinking the worst case running time of this algorithm is t(n)=2^n, because if n is large, it will decompose into 2 separate calculations, which in turn will split into 2 more and so on. I'm just not sure how to formally justify this
推荐答案
让我们首先获得运行时间的递归.
Let's first get a recursion for the running time.
T(0) = T(1) = 1
因为两者都只返回一个数字(一个是对数组的查找,但这也是恒定时间).对于n > 1
,我们有
since both just return a number (one is an array-lookup, but that's constant time too). And for n > 1
we have
T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) + 1
因为您评估f(n-1)
和f(n-2)
并将两个结果相加.这与斐波那契序列本身F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2)
的重复率几乎相同,并且结果密切相关.
since you evaluate f(n-1)
and f(n-2)
and add the two results. That's almost the same recurrence as the Fibonacci sequence itself, F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2)
, and the result is closely related.
n | T(n) | F(n)
----------------
0 | 1 | 0
1 | 1 | 1
2 | 3 | 1
3 | 5 | 2
4 | 9 | 3
5 | 15 | 5
6 | 25 | 8
7 | 41 | 13
8 | 67 | 21
9 | 109 | 34
10 | 177 | 55
11 | 287 | 89
如果查看这些值,就会看到
If you look at the values, you see that
T(n) = F(n+2) + F(n-1) - 1
并可以通过归纳证明这一点.
and can prove that with induction, if you need to.
由于斐波那契数列的项由F(n) = (φ^n - (1-φ)^n)/√5
给出,其中φ = (1 + √5)/2
,因此您看到f
的复杂度也为Θ(φ^n)
,就像斐波那契数列一样.这比Θ(2^n)
更好,但仍然是指数级的,因此使用这种方法进行的计算仅适用于较小的n
.
Since the terms of the Fibonacci sequence are given by F(n) = (φ^n - (1-φ)^n)/√5
, where φ = (1 + √5)/2
, you see that the complexity of your f
is also Θ(φ^n)
, like that of the Fibonacci sequence. That's better than Θ(2^n)
, but still exponential, so calculation using this way is only feasible for small n
.
这篇关于该算法最坏的运行时间(如何证明)?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!