Antrl3条件树重写 [英] Antrl3 conditional tree rewrites

查看:115
本文介绍了Antrl3条件树重写的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

Stackoverflow.

Stackoverflow.

继续我进入Antlr的旅程(先前的问题可能会提供有关我要实现的目标的其他线索!第二季度-解决了LL递归问题)我遇到了又一个无法解决的障碍.

Continuing on my journey into Antlr (Previous questions may provide additional clues on what I'm trying to achieve! Q1 - How do I make a tree parser and Q2 - Solving LL recursion problem) I've hit yet another roadblock I cannot flathom.

基本上(我认为)我语法中的expression规则需要根据匹配的datatype的数量创建一个新的根节点.我整理了一个示例,以尽力描述我的意思:

Basically (I believe) the expression rule in my grammar needs to either create a new root node depending on the number of datatypes it has matched. I have put together an example to try best describe what I mean:

给出以下输入:

ComplexFunction(id="Test" args:[1, 25 + 9 + 8, true, [1,2,3]])

我得到这棵树:

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/2273/treeka.png

供参考-正确解析"args"数组中的第一个元素.而数组"args""25 + 9 + 8"中的第二个元素则没有.它似乎只匹配表达式的最后2个部分(9 + 8).

For reference - The first element in the "args" array as been correctly parsed. Whereas the 2nd element in the array "args" '25 + 9 + 8' has not. It appears to only match the last 2 parts of the expression (9 + 8).

我正试图使数组的第二个元素成为EXPRESSION节点,并带有3个孩子25、9和8).

I'm trying to get the 2nd element of the array to be an EXPRESSION node, with the 3 children 25, 9, and 8).

老实说,我被困住了,需要您的帮助(再次).谢谢您的时间:)

I'm honestly stuck and need your help (Again). Thanks for your time :)

作为参考,这是我的语法:

For reference, here is my grammar:

grammar Test;

options {output=AST;ASTLabelType=CommonTree;}
tokens {FUNCTION; NAME; ATTRIBUTES; ATTRIBUTE; VALUE; CHILDREN; EXPRESSION;}

program  : function ;
function :  ID (OPEN_BRACKET (attribute (COMMA? attribute)*)? CLOSE_BRACKET)? (OPEN_BRACE function* CLOSE_BRACE)? SEMICOLON? -> ^(FUNCTION ^(NAME ID) ^(ATTRIBUTES attribute*) ^(CHILDREN function*)) ;

attribute : ID (COLON | EQUALS) expression -> ^(ATTRIBUTE ^(NAME ID) ^(VALUE expression));

expression : datatype (PLUS datatype)* -> datatype ^(EXPRESSION datatype+)?;

datatype : ID  ->  ^(STRING["ID"] ID)
   | NUMBER -> ^(STRING["NUMBER"] NUMBER)
   |  STRING  -> ^(STRING["STRING"] STRING)
   |   BOOLEAN ->  ^(STRING["BOOLEAN"] BOOLEAN)
   |   array -> ^(STRING["ARRAY"] array)
   |   lookup  ->  ^(STRING["LOOKUP"] lookup) ;

array  :  OPEN_BOX (expression (COMMA expression)*)? CLOSE_BOX -> expression* ;

lookup  : OPEN_BRACE (ID (PERIOD ID)*) CLOSE_BRACE -> ID* ;

NUMBER
 : ('+' | '-')? (INTEGER | FLOAT)
 ;

STRING
    :  '"' ( ESC_SEQ | ~('\\'|'"') )* '"'
    ;

BOOLEAN
 : 'true' | 'TRUE' | 'false' | 'FALSE'
 ;

ID  : (LETTER|'_') (LETTER | INTEGER |'_')*
    ;

COMMENT
    :   '//' ~('\n'|'\r')* '\r'? '\n' {$channel=HIDDEN;}
    |   '/*' ( options {greedy=false;} : . )* '*/' {$channel=HIDDEN;}
    ;

WHITESPACE : (' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n') {$channel=HIDDEN;} ;

COLON : ':' ;
SEMICOLON : ';' ;

COMMA : ',' ;
PERIOD  :  '.' ;
PLUS : '+' ;
EQUALS : '=' ; 

OPEN_BRACKET : '(' ;
CLOSE_BRACKET : ')' ;

OPEN_BRACE : '{' ; 
CLOSE_BRACE : '}' ;

OPEN_BOX : '[' ;
CLOSE_BOX : ']' ;

fragment
LETTER
 : 'a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' 
 ;

fragment
INTEGER
 : '0'..'9'+
 ;

fragment
FLOAT
 : INTEGER+ '.' INTEGER*
 ;

fragment
ESC_SEQ
    :   '\\' ('b'|'t'|'n'|'f'|'r'|'\"'|'\''|'\\')
    ;

推荐答案

哈哈!我想我明白了!如果还有其他人遇到类似的问题,请查看我的新语法:

Haha! I think I got it! If anyone else has a similar problem take a look at my new grammar:

grammar Test;

options {output=AST;ASTLabelType=CommonTree;}
tokens {FUNCTION; ATTRIBUTES; ATTRIBUTE; VALUE; CHILDREN; EXPRESSION;}

@parser::members { int dataTypeCount = 0; }

program     :   function ;
function    :   ID (OPEN_BRACKET (attribute (COMMA? attribute)*)? CLOSE_BRACKET)? (OPEN_BRACE function* CLOSE_BRACE)? SEMICOLON? -> ^(FUNCTION ^(ID["ID"] ID) ^(ATTRIBUTES attribute*) ^(CHILDREN function*)) ;

attribute   :   ID (COLON | EQUALS) expression -> ^(ATTRIBUTE ^(ID["ID"] ID) ^(VALUE expression));

expression  :   datatype {dataTypeCount = 1;} (PLUS datatype {dataTypeCount++;})*   
                -> {dataTypeCount == 1}? datatype*
                -> ^(EXPRESSION datatype*) ;    

datatype    :   ID      ->  ^(STRING["ID"] ID)
            |   NUMBER  ->  ^(STRING["NUMBER"] NUMBER)
            |   STRING  ->  ^(STRING["STRING"] STRING)
            |   BOOLEAN ->  ^(STRING["BOOLEAN"] BOOLEAN)
            |   array   ->  ^(STRING["ARRAY"] array)
            |   lookup  ->  ^(STRING["LOOKUP"] lookup) ;

array       :   OPEN_BOX (expression (COMMA expression)*)? CLOSE_BOX -> expression* ;

lookup      :   OPEN_BRACE (ID (PERIOD ID)*) CLOSE_BRACE -> ID* ;

NUMBER
    :   ('+' | '-')? (INTEGER | FLOAT)
    ;

STRING
    :  '"' ( ESC_SEQ | ~('\\'|'"') )* '"'
    ;

BOOLEAN
    :   'true' | 'TRUE' | 'false' | 'FALSE'
    ;

ID  :   (LETTER|'_') (LETTER | INTEGER |'_')*
    ;

COMMENT
    :   '//' ~('\n'|'\r')* '\r'? '\n' {$channel=HIDDEN;}
    |   '/*' ( options {greedy=false;} : . )* '*/' {$channel=HIDDEN;}
    ;

WHITESPACE  :   (' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n') {$channel=HIDDEN;} ;

COLON   :   ':' ;
SEMICOLON   :   ';' ;

COMMA   :   ',' ;
PERIOD  :   '.' ;
PLUS    :   '+' ;
EQUALS  :   '=' ;   

OPEN_BRACKET    :   '(' ;
CLOSE_BRACKET   :   ')' ;

OPEN_BRACE  :   '{' ;   
CLOSE_BRACE :   '}' ;

OPEN_BOX    :   '[' ;
CLOSE_BOX   :   ']' ;

fragment
LETTER
    :   'a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' 
    ;

fragment
INTEGER
    :   '0'..'9'+
    ;

fragment
FLOAT
    :   INTEGER+ '.' INTEGER*
    ;

fragment
ESC_SEQ
    :   '\\' ('b'|'t'|'n'|'f'|'r'|'\"'|'\''|'\\')
    ;

这篇关于Antrl3条件树重写的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆