APC VS PECL上传进度 [英] APC vs pecl uploadprogress

问题描述

在drupal的状态报告页面中，我通常会找到此消息(在全新安装中):

In the Status Report page in drupal, i usually find this message (on fresh installation):

您的服务器能够显示文件上传进度，但是没有必需的库.建议安装PECL上传进度库(首选)或安装APC.

但是我从来不明白为什么它相对于 PECL上载进度库 http://us2.php.net/apc"rel =" nofollow noreferrer> APC ，今天是我的问题.

But i never understood why its preferred the PECL uploadprogress library over APC, and that's my question today.

与APC相比，pecl上传进度更快，占用的系统资源更少还是更易于安装/配置/使用?

Is pecl uploadprogress faster, take less system resources, or is more easy to install/configure/use then APC?

有人对为什么它比APC更受青睐有想法吗? (围绕APC vs pecl uploadprogress的googlin不会在有用的后面返回)

Anyone have ideas about why it is preferred over APC? (googlin around for APC vs pecl uploadprogress doesnt return nothin usefull)

推荐答案

此博客文章的第二条评论中有一个有趣的信息:

There is an interesting information in the second comment of this blog-post : Upload Progress Meter - Common issues and some answers : (quoting) :

主要区别是:此 扩展使用文件系统作为 临时存储，APC使用共享 记忆力.如果您想使用 除APC以外的另一个Bytecodecache或 不想为任何安装APC 原因，这提供了 功能.

The main difference is: this extension uses the filesystem as temporary storage, APC uses shared memory. And if you'd like to use another Bytecodecache than APC or do not want to install APC for any reason, this one provides that functionality, too.

(博客文章和评论均来自Christian Stocker，他是 pecl::uploadprogress 扩展名；所以我想他知道他在说什么^^)

(Both the blog-post and that comment are from Christian Stocker, one of the two authors of the pecl::uploadprogress extension ; so I guess he knows what he's talking about ^^ )

这篇关于APC VS PECL上传进度的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！