Rails 3.1生产中的资产管道 [英] Rails 3.1 assets pipeline in production

问题描述

我正在使用资产管道(在Rails 3.1.3中)，并且正在努力使其在生产中工作.

I am using the assets pipeline (in Rails 3.1.3) and am kind of struggling to make it work in production.

在我的/app/assets/stylesheets目录中，有以下文件:

In my /app/assets/stylesheets directory I have the following files:

application.css --> this is the default rails one
stylesheet.css --> This is my custom stylesheet

我花了很多时间将我的stylesheet.css包含在生产环境中的/public/assets/目录中(通过运行rake assets:precompile)，最终我通过将以下行添加到我的application.rb文件中来做到了: >

I spent a lot of time getting my stylesheet.css included in the /public/assets/directory in production (by running rake assets:precompile) and I finally made it by adding the following line into in my application.rb file:

    config.assets.precompile += ['stylesheet.css']

我知道生产中的预编译stylesheet.css文件正确.

I know have the right precompiled stylesheet.css file in production.

我的问题是在stylesheet.css文件中使用stylesheet_link_tag时.事实证明:

The problem I have is when using stylesheet_link_tag with my stylesheet.css file. It turns out:

<%= stylesheet_link_tag "stylesheet" %>在生产中将解析为<link href="/stylesheets/stylesheet.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"> ，我希望将路径解析为/assets/stylesheet.css ，就像在开发中一样.

<%= stylesheet_link_tag "stylesheet" %> is resolved into <link href="/stylesheets/stylesheet.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"> in production I would expect the path to be resolved into /assets/stylesheet.css just like it does in development.

更令人惊讶的是，即使<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application"%>解析为<link href="/stylesheets/stylesheet.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">，application.css的表现也很完美.我不明白的是，rails 3.1中不存在public/stylesheets/目录.

What is even more surprising is that application.css behaves perfectly even though <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application"%> resolves into <link href="/stylesheets/stylesheet.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">. What I don't understand is that the public/stylesheets/ directory does not exist in rails 3.1.

有什么主意吗?

推荐答案

Richard Hulse的答案将我引向了正确的方向.发生的事情真的很微妙.

Richard Hulse answers pointed me to the right direction. What happens is really subtle..

我的问题的答案是> Rails 3.1资产没有生产中的指纹.

基本上，我的项目使用mongoid而不是ActiveRecord.根据Mongoid关于配置的文档，可以将application.rb文件修改为不包含ActiveRecord表示删除:

Basically, my project use mongoid instead of ActiveRecord. According to Mongoid documentation about configuration, the application.rb file can be modified to not include ActiveRecord which means removing:

require railties/all

并替换为:

require "action_controller/railtie"
require "action_mailer/railtie"
require "active_resource/railtie"
require "rails/test_unit/railtie"
# require "sprockets/railtie" # Uncomment this line for Rails 3.1+

我曾经很习惯用Rails 3.0.x进行这种操作，以至于我没有注意与Rails 3.1相关的评论

I was so used to doing this manipulation with rails 3.0.x that I did not pay attention to the comment related to Rails 3.1

我的问题是我不需要链轮！

谢谢大家的帮助！

这篇关于Rails 3.1生产中的资产管道的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！