Axis和Axis2之间的区别以开发Web Service [英] Difference between Axis and Axis2 to develop Web Service

问题描述

在我的项目中，我将不得不基于Web Service技术开发一些数据输入/输出接口.所以直到现在我都对此进行了研究.

In my project, I will have to develop a some data in/out interfaces based on Web Service technology. So until now I have studied about it.

我对使用Java的Web服务感到好奇的是，我可以使用或不使用哪种库.

What I am curious about Web Service with Java is what library I can use or not.

当我搜索Java库时，我发现Axis2和CXF是非常常见且著名的Java w/s库.问题是我必须使用包含轴的RAD 7.0.

As I searched java library, I found that Axis2 and CXF are very common and famous java w/s library. The problem is I have to use RAD 7.0 which contains axis.

似乎Axis和Axis2之间有很大的变化，不幸的是我不能使用Axis2.

It seems there are huge change between Axis and Axis2 and unfortunately I can't use Axis2.

现在，我的合作伙伴提供了WSDL，我必须实现客户端W/S. 如果我通过Axis或Axis2或CXF从WSDL创建客户端代理代码，那么它们是否都是相同的代码?

Now, my partner provides WSDL and I have to implement client-side W/S. If I create client-side proxy code from WSDL by Axis or Axis2 or CXF, are they all same code?

或者如果我必须使用WSDL为Axis提供我的W/S接口，那么Axis2或CXF用户会遇到问题吗?

Or If I have to make WSDL to provide my W/S interface with Axis, can it be the problem to Axis2 or CXF user?

在我的情况下，我很新，并且害怕使用Axis. 有人可以给我一些建议吗?

In my circumstance, I am very new and afraid of using Axis. Can anybody give me some advice??

谢谢.

祝你有美好的一天.

推荐答案

否，它们每个都生成不同的代码. 尽管它们都是出于相同的目的.

No, each of them generates a different code. Though they all work for the same purpose.

与Axis相比，我个人更喜欢Axis2.

I personally prefer Axis2 over Axis.

只要在每种优点和缺点之间取得各种利弊，就可以完成以下步骤: 比较链接之间的差异

Just to get various pros and cons on each of them, you can go through this: comparison link

这篇关于Axis和Axis2之间的区别以开发Web Service的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！